Sort by:
Title (
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
)
Sites currently sorted by: Title (A to Z)
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
) Sites currently sorted by: Title (A to Z)
AMD launched the first FX CPU in six years back in 2011. But a lot have changed since
then, and the FX CPU is more mainstream than extreme. The AMD FX CPU we are looking at
here, is their FX-4130 with a very affordable price tag.
The top Vishera-based AMD FX-8350 processor was just the beginning. After it, AMD rolled out a number of more affordable CPUs. Today we're going to cover them in comparison with the predecessors and competitors.
Technic3D hat die AMD FX-4350 CPU im Test. In der Mittelklasse versucht AMD mit neuen Modellen die Leistung anzuheben. Ob dies gegen die Konkurrenz gelingt steht im folgenden Kurztest.
Di fronte alle nuove soluzione Intel Haswell, come ha intenzione AMD di contrastare il successo di Intel nel settore desktop? Lo scopriremo analizzando gli ultimi due processori che AMD ha introdotto sul mercato, parliamo del modello esa-core FX-6350 e del modello quad-core FX-4350. L’obiettivo di AMD è proporre CPU a prezzo contenuto, con una feature che piace tanto ai nostri lettori: l’overclock! Sarà sufficiente questa caratteristica a far pendere l’ago della bilancia verso le soluzioni AMD? Lo scopriremo in questo articolo.
Mit dem FX-6350 und dem FX-4350 bringt AMD sogenannte Speedbumps in den Handel, die etwas mehr Leistung bieten als ihre Vorgänger und in die 125-Watt-Klasse einsortiert werden. Der Test der beiden günstigen FX zeigt, wie schnell und effizient diese rechnen.
Over the last few weeks, AMD has adjusted the pricing of both the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition and the AMD FX-8120 Black Edition to make them more competitive against the Intel Core i5 2500K and 2400.
The 8-core FX-8120 CPU from AMD gets near the 2500K performances in heavy multithreaded apps and thanks to its unlocked features, we can overclock it near 50% (depending on the quality of the batch). Thanks to the latest price reductions and promotions, it gets into the area of mainstream CPUs, making it attractive for people that do not want to spend excessively on their new upgrade.
We have been waiting for months, but Bulldozer is finally here. The weeks leading up to the launch of the new FX line of processors hasn't been the best for AMD with a large amount of leaks that haven't put the new FX-8150 in the best light. Today, though, leaks don't matter; unofficial results don't matter. We've got all the latest drivers, the latest BIOS updates and it's time to see what Bulldozer can do. There's no denying that AMD are going to have a tough fight on their hands, though. AMD have stated that the new platform is only designed to compete against the current crop of Sandy Bridge CPUs.
Today we get to see for the first time how the top model in AMDs new FX range of CPUs, previously known as Bulldozer, performs against the existing Intel equivalent as we put the two CPUs head to head. Not only that though we will test their entire platform, testing gaming, USB 3.0, SATA 6Gb/s and PCIe performance.
The Corsair CMGTX4 and CMGTX7 were two of the fastest RAM kits available at the time; they carried with them a huge price tag and 'till today, the speed on the GTX4 kit is just insane. Both kits are dual channel, but neither would achieve their rated speeds. While overclocking on the Z68 platform is great, its memory overclocking is limited and actually not as strong as the older P55 when it comes to raw MHz. Having unfortunately admitted defeat on these two kits, I never got around to actually looking at them, because we couldn't get the default speeds.
execution time : 0.082 sec