Review: ASUS Maximus V Extreme
Category : Z77
Published by Marc Büchel on 05.07.12
The Maximus V Extreme, is ASUS' new flagship model regarding Intels latest Z77 chipset. The guys over there at ASUS ROG put a lot of new features on the board. On the paper it looks like they've moved their flagship ROG board to another level (yet again?). So it's quite understandable that we can't wait to have a close look at this product.







The Maximus V Extreme is ASUS' latest high end overclocking motherboard creation regarding Intels Z77 chipset. We're really curious how this thing is going to cope with our benchmark parcours. Of course we're also looking at this board from a layout and design perspective and last but not least we added an extra page for the features. In fact there are even more extras with this review. This is the first article you find on ocaholic where the last page covers the editors own, personal opinion about the product. We try to focus only on the facts in our reviews which we think is a really good thing but unfortunately, when a review wasn't bad there will be almost no discussions at all. This in mind we give you some more room for interpretations of our articles.

Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Specs and Delivery

CPU Intel Socket 1155 3rd/2nd Generation Core i7/i5/i3/Pentium/Celeron (22/32nm)
Chipset Intel Z77 Express
Memory Dual Channel
4 x DIMM, max. 32GB, DDR3 2800 (OC) / 2666 (OC) / 2600(OC) / 2400 (OC) / 2200 (OC) / 2133 (OC) / 2000 (OC) / 1866 (OC) / 1600 / 1333 / 1066 MHz, non-ECC, un-buffered memory, XMP 1.3
Multi-GPU NVIDIA 4-Way SLI
AMD 4-Way CrossFireX
LucidLogix Virtu MVP Technology
Slots 5 x PCI-Express 3.0 x16
- Configuration:
- x16 (Z77)
- x8/x8 (Z77)
- x8/x8/x8 (PLX)
- x8/x8/x8/x8 (PLX)

1 x PCI-Express 2.0 x4
1 x mini-PCI Express 2.0 x1 (mPCI Combo)
Audio Realtek ALC898 7.1-Channel HD Audio Codec
Storage 2 x SATA 6.0 Gbps (Intel, red)
2 x SATA 3.0 Gbps (Intel, black)
2 x SATA 6.0 Gbps (ASMedia, red)
2 x SATA 6.0 Gbps (ASMedia, red)
Bluetooth Bluetooth v4.0
LAN 1 x Intel Gigabit LAN
I/O internal 2 x USB 3.0 connectors support additional 4 USB 3.0 ports (1x Z77 & 1x ASMedia)
2 x USB 2.0 connectors support additional 4 USB 2.0 ports (Z77)
6 x SATA 6 Gb/s connectors (red) (2x Z77 & 4x ASMedia)
2 x SATA 3 Gb/s connectors (black) (Z77)
1 x eSATA 3 gb/s
2 x Subzero Sense connectors
2 x VGA Hotwire header sets
1 x OC Key header
1 x ROG Connect switch header
8 x 4-pin Fan connectors: 2 x CPU, 3 x Chassis / 3 x Optional
15 x ProbeIt measurement points
7 x ProbeIt cable connectors
3 x Thermal sensor connectors
1 x 6-pin EZ Plug connector (blak) (for PCIe slots)
1 x 4-pin EZ Plug connector (white) (for back I/O and PCIe slots)
1 x LN2 Mode header
1 x Slow Mode switch
1 x START (Power-on) button
1 x Reset button
1 x Go button
1 x S/PDIF OUT header
1 x Front panel audio connector (AAFP)
1 x System panel connector
1 x mPCIe Combo header
1 x 24-pin EATX 12V power connector
1 x 8-pin EATX 12V power connector
1 x 4-pin EATX 12V power connector
I/O Back Panel 1 x Thunderbolt port
1 x Clear CMOS button
1 x ROG Connect On/Off button
4 x USB 2.0 (1 x ROG Connect)
1 x PS/2 Keyboard/mouse combo port
4 x USB 3.0 ports (blue) (2x Z77 & 2x ASMedia)
1 x Optical S/PDIF IN
1 x Optical S/PDIF OUT
1 x HDMI port
1 x DisplayPort
1 x LAN (RJ45) port
5 x Audio jacks
Forfactor Extended-ATX (30.5cm x 27.2cm)


   


   




Regarding the delivery one might find more than needed. For instance: you get a quad- and a tripl-SLI bridge which feature a PCB. Furthermore there is a flexible SLI-bridge as well as a flexible CrossFire-Bridge. One can also be very curious about the OC-Key which allows an overlay screen while you're benching your system. For this littel bugger we will write an independant article.



Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



Discuss this article in the forums[pagebreak]

Features

Extreme Engine Digi+ II Since quite some time ASUS has been equipping its boards with digital power designs. Using the right software it is not only possible to adjust voltages while being in Windows on can now also control impedances. Furthermore this board features high quality 10K black metallic capacitor which guarantee a long lifespan.

 
Thunderbolt ASUS ships the Maximus V Extreme with native Thunderbolt support. Utilizing the x4 lanes of PCI Express together with the iGPU integrated DisplayPort output, the Maximus V Extreme is capable of delivering a simultaneous bi-directional throughput of 10 Gbps data via this Thunderbolt port. This port is also capable of displaying video content with up to 2560 x 1600 resolution. Fruthermore it is also possible to realize a triple display solution using only the iGPU.

 
3.3 Volt Power Generator Many VGA cards rely heavily on the delivery of +3.3V for its display PLL and VSynch functionalities. Furthermore the +3.3V rail also asks as a major source of pull-up for various parts of the GPU. ASUS has now made a dedicated PCI Express 3.3V Power Generator, which generates its own power to the +3.3V Aux used by VGA cards. This allows the VGA cards to consume +3.3V Aux power independent from what was made available through the +3.3V rail of their power supply. At the end of the day this feature allows better overclocking capabilities especiall for multi GPU setups.

 
VGA Power Control Extreme overclockers often look for ways to easily increase the voltages on their VGA cards. Using VGA Power Controller you get four sets of pin connections to the SMBus Clock and SMBus Data. Users will be able to make adjustments of the l2C Address, Over Current Protection, Load-Line, Manual Voltage Level and Switching Frequency to the power solution of up to four VGA cards at the same time.

 
Subzero Sense Subzero Sense integrates 2 x Type-K Probe digital Thermometers onboard. This enables extreme overclockers to be able to keep track of the critical temperature on the fly within the range between -200 to +200°C.

 
OC Key OC Key enables useres with the capability to conduct CPU-free, debug tool (OSD Poster), real-time monitor (OSD Monitor) and tweaking (OSD TweakIt) on the same screen used by the overclocking system.

 
VGA Hotwire The VGA Hotwire integrates a set of six variable resistors, each paired up with a dedicated voltage sensor, allowing extreme overclockers to be able to make direct detection, as well as modifications to the VGA cards without having to go through the trouble of skilling themselves to operate the external veriable resistors, in order to complete the mod.

 
mPCIe Combo expansion card The ROG mPCIe Combo expansion card enables users to expand the capability of the motherboard with either the mSATA or mPCIe devices. Furthermore there is the bundled BT3.0/4.0 with Dual Band WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n card.

 
EPU If you activate the EPU this chip monitors all possible voltages and clock speeds and automatically sets them to guarantee an energy efficient operation of you system.
 
TPU As soon as one activates the TPU this chips monitors all possible voltages and clock speeds using the according software. The difference to the EPU is that TPU will provide as much performance as possible. Therefore it can increase clock speeds and voltages.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Layout

At a first glance the ASUS Maximus V Extreme looks very good with its harmonic design. Once again the ROG-colors - red, black and white - suite nicely and together with the black PCB it becomes a beautiful product. The layout itself is well thought and there is for example plenty of space around the CPU socket to install even todays largest CPU coolers. The fact that there are SATA connector which have been angled by 90 degrees allow an easy installation of oversized graphics cards.


The ASUS Maximus V Extreme comes with a digital 8+4+2 phase power design. The CPU gets eight phases, the iGPU can rely on four phases and the memory gets a stable current supply from two individual pahses. Furthermore ASUS equips this board with their so called "Black Metallic Chokes". These can resist temperatures ranging from -70°C to +125°C. This makes the power desing even better for extreme overclocking where extremely low temperatures around the CPU socket can be reached.


Totally you'll find four DIMM-slots on the Maximus V Extreme. Officially supported are DDR3 2800 (OC), 2666 (OC), 2600(OC), 2400 (OC), 2200 (OC), 2133 (OC), 2000 (OC), 1866 (OC), 1600, 1333 and 1066 MHz. There is engough space between the DIMM-slots and the CPU socket which means that you wont encounter compatibility problems with big coolers even when you choose to install RAM with big heatspreaders. Also supported are Xtreme Memory Profiles (XMP) in version 1.3.


On the Maximus V Extreme the southbridge as well as the PLX chip, which can be found between CPU socket and the first PCI-Express x16 slot, are being cooled by passiv cooling blocks, which have been connected via a heatpipe. For the current converters we see a very similar picture. There are also two passive cooling elements connected via a heatpipe. In fact, the PLX chip is always an interesting feature. In this case ASUS chose to put a PLX PEX8747 PCI Express 3.0 bridge chip onto the board. This chip is able to multiply the 16 lanes, which come from the CPU, by two an therefore provied 32 lanes. As long as you don't use more than two graphics card 16 lanes are sufficient but once you run a setup with three or four graphics cards you will need at least 24 or 32 lanes.

  


Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



Discuss this article in the forums

[pagebreak]

Connectors and I/O

Totally ASUS equipped the Maximus V Extreme with eight angled SATA ports. At the bottom edge of the board there is an additional straight SATA port. This should be enough for any office gaming system or overclocking setup. You'll also find practical onboard power- and reset-buttons in the top right corner of the board. There is also a debug display. Furthermore in this area of the board there are voltage read out point. Almost standard for the ROG Extreme motherboards meanwhile is the possiblity to disable the different PCI-Express x16 Slots one by one. Between power/reset button and the DIMM slots one can find the VGA Power Control as well as the VGA Hotwire headers to which you can connect the cables you soldered to a GPUs voltage regulation. You can even disable your GPUs over current protection, adjust load-line or switching frequency.

 

Totally you'll find eight fan header on the Maximus V Extreme which is more than enough, to provide a well equipped high-end or overclocking-system with fresh air. The fan headers are located around the CPU socket as spread over the motherboard

  

Looking at the external connectors directly at the back-panel ASUS equipped the Maximus V Extreme with one PS2 mouse/keyboard connector, four USB 3.0/2.0 ports, four USB 2.0/1.1 ports, an expansion slot for the mPCIe expanson card, which is included in delivery, one gigabit ethernet port, an HDMI and a DisplayPort connector as well as an optical out and an analogue audio panel. Furtheremore you'll also find a Thunderbolt connector, a clear CMOS button and a BIOS flashback button.



Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



Discuss this article in the forums [pagebreak]

BIOS

Also for their Z77 motherboards Gigabyte is using a graphical UEFI BIOS that can be controled via mouse and keyboard. An interesting and for unexperienced useres practical approach is the picture one can see when the BIOS is accessed. In fact it is an interactive graphic which lets you click on certain areas of the board to select them.

   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   


   



Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
Page 11 - PC Mark 7  


Discuss this article in the forums [pagebreak]

Test setup

Hardware

Motherboard
  • ASUS Maximus V Extreme
  • ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
  • ASUS P8Z77 WS
  • ASUS P8Z77-V
  • ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
  • ASUS Maximus V Gene
  • ASRock Z77 Extreme6
  • ASUS Sabertooth Z77
  • ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
  • ASUS P8H77-I
  • ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
  • Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
  • Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
  • Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
  • Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
  • Intel DZ77GA-70K
  • Processor Intel Core i7-3770K, 3.5 GHz
    Memory 4 Gigabyte Kingston H2O KHX2133 @ 1600 MHz CL8-8-8-24
    Graphic card ASUS ENGTX 580
    Driver Version 275.33
    Hard disk Samsung Spinpoint F1 320 GByte
    Power supply bequiet! Dark Power Pro 1000Watt


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums

    [pagebreak]

    3D Mark

    3D Mark11

    3DMark 11 is Futuremarks latest benchmark for the entire graphical subsystem. The benchmark uses DirectX 11 and it supports all recent features which can possibly generate high load on a GPU. Therefore you find tessellation, compute shader calculations, divers lighting effects and different depth of filed animations. Following we publish values regarding the performance preset of 3DMark 11.

    Total

    3D Mark 11 Total
    Review Rating
      Percent
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    6'666 100.03 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    6'665 100.02 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    6'664 100.00 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    6'664 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    6'663 99.98 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    6'663 99.98 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    6'662 99.97 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    6'660 99.94 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    6'656 99.88 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    6'655 99.86 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    6'650 99.79 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    6'649 99.77 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    6'639 99.62 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    6'588 98.84 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    6'587 98.84 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    6'568 98.56 %
      more is better


    Physic

    3D Mark 11 CPU Score
    Review Rating
      Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    9'446 101.22 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    9'446 101.22 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    9'426 101.01 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    9'424 100.99 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    9'423 100.98 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    9'414 100.88 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    9'412 100.86 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    9'396 100.68 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    9'396 100.68 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    9'376 100.47 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    9'354 100.24 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    9'347 100.16 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    9'332 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    9'324 99.91 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    9'246 99.08 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    9'081 97.31 %
      more is better



    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums [pagebreak]

    3D Mark Vantage

    3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze a lot out of a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems struggle.

    Total

    3D Mark Vantage Total
    Review Rating
      Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    26'270 100.81 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    26'255 100.76 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    26'254 100.75 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    26'229 100.66 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    26'171 100.43 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    26'136 100.30 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    26'123 100.25 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    26'088 100.12 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    26'084 100.10 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    26'062 100.01 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    26'059 100.00 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    26'058 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    26'041 99.93 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    25'994 99.75 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    25'929 99.50 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    25'633 98.37 %
      more is better


    CPU

    3D Mark Vantage CPU
    Review Rating
      Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    25'525 101.66 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    25'421 101.25 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    25'383 101.10 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    25'378 101.08 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    25'354 100.98 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    25'327 100.87 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    25'316 100.83 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    25'300 100.76 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    25'290 100.72 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    25'255 100.59 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    25'168 100.24 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    25'108 100.00 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    25'100 99.97 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    25'067 99.84 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    25'054 99.78 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    25'034 99.71 %
      more is better


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums

    [pagebreak]

    3D Mark 2001

    3D Mark 2001
    Review Rating
      Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    61'642 102.37 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    61'335 101.86 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    60'998 101.30 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    60'947 101.21 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    60'808 100.98 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    60'607 100.65 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    60'360 100.24 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    60'359 100.24 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    60'216 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    60'055 99.73 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    60'026 99.68 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    59'875 99.43 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    59'762 99.25 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    59'743 99.21 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    59'623 99.02 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    59'255 98.40 %
      more is better



    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums [pagebreak]

    PC Mark 07

    3DMark 11 is Futuremarks latest benchmark for the entire graphical subsystem. The benchmark uses DirectX 11 and it supports all recent features which can possibly generate high load on a GPU. Therefore you find tessellation, compute shader calculations, divers lighting effects and different depth of filed animations. Following we publish values regarding the performance preset of 3DMark 11.

    Total

    PC Mark 07 Total
    Review Rating
      Percent
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    5'336 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    5'328 99.85 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    5'322 99.74 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    5'320 99.70 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    5'318 99.66 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    5'318 99.66 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    5'257 98.52 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    5'251 98.41 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    5'241 98.21 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    5'240 98.20 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    5'235 98.11 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    5'223 97.88 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    5'209 97.62 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    5'208 97.60 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    5'201 97.47 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    5'076 95.13 %
      more is better


    Video playback and transcoding / Video playback
    Review Rating
    fps Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    23.16 100.13 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    23.14 100.04 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    23.13 100.00 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    23.13 100.00 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    23.12 99.57 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    23.12 99.57 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    23.11 99.91 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    23.11 99.91 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    23.11 99.91 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    23.11 99.91 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    23.10 99.87 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    23.10 99.87 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    23.10 99.87 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    23.10 99.87 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    23.10 99.87 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    23.10 99.87 %
      more is better


    Graphics - DirectX 9 / Graphics - DirectX 9
    Review Rating
    fps Percent
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    90.71 101.45 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    90.50 101.22 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    90.39 101.10 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    90.32 101.02 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    90.17 100.85 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    90.15 100.83 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    90.11 100.78 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    90.09 100.76 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    90.01 100.67 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    89.93 100.58 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    89.59 100.20 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    89.41 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    89.30 99.88 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    88.77 99.28 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    88.43 98.90 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    88.29 98.75 %
      more is better


    Image manipulation / Image manipulation
    Review Rating
    Mpx/s Percent
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    11.88 100.93 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    11.87 100.85 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    11.83 100.51 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    11.83 100.51 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    11.83 100.51 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    11.81 100.34 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    11.80 100.25 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    11.79 100.17 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    11.78 100.08 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    11.78 100.08 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    11.77 100.00 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    11.77 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    11.76 99.92 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    11.76 99.92 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    11.74 99.75 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    11.72 99.58 %
      more is better


    Web browsing and decrypting / Web browsing
    Review Rating
    Pages/s Percent
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    18.19 100.94 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    18.13 100.61 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    18.07 100.28 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    18.04 100.11 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    18.03 100.06 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    18.02 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    17.99 99.83 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    17.95 99.61 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    17.93 99.50 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    17.92 99.45 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    17.91 99.39 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    17.83 98.95 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    17.74 98.45 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    17.39 96.50 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    16.44 91.23 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    17.60 97.67 %
      more is better


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums

    [pagebreak]

    SiSoft Sandra 1

    SiSoft Sandra is a theoretical multi purpose benchmark suite which is able to show differences in CPU architectures. We split the tests with SiSoft Sandra into two parts. Therefore on this page you'll find Arithmetic-, Multimedia- and Cryptograph99y-benchmarks.

    Arithmetic Benchmark

    SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic Benchmark - Dhrystone
    Review Rating
    GIPS Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    116.00 101.05 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    116.00 101.05 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    115.77 100.85 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    115.61 100.71 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    115.58 100.69 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    115.50 100.62 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    115.42 100.55 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    115.32 100.46 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    115.30 100.44 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    115.26 100.41 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    115.24 100.39 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    115.22 100.37 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    115.00 100.18 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    114.79 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    114.63 99.86 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    114.37 99.63 %
      more is better


    SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic Benchmark - Whetstone
    Review Rating
    GFLOPS Percent
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    88.89 100.49 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    88.82 100.41 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    88.78 100.36 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    88.62 100.18 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    88.52 100.07 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    88.50 100.05 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    88.47 100.01 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    88.46 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    88.44 99.97 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    88.22 99.73 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    88.22 99.73 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    88.18 99.68 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    88.00 99.48 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    88.00 99.48 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    87.82 99.28 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    87.80 99.25 %
      more is better


    Multimedia

    SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Integer
    Review Rating
    MPixels/sec Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    212.26 100.91 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    212.24 100.90 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    212.09 100.83 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    212.00 100.78 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    211.62 100.60 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    211.39 100.49 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    211.29 100.45 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    211.27 100.44 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    211.13 100.37 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    211.00 100.31 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    210.88 100.25 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    210.74 100.19 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    210.63 100.13 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    210.51 100.07 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    210.38 100.01 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    210.35 100.00 %
      more is better


    SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Floating Point
    Review Rating
    MPixels/sec Percent
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    297.67 100.95 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    297.63 100.94 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    297.10 100.76 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    297.10 100.76 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    296.85 100.67 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    296.59 100.58 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    296.14 100.43 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    296.00 100.38 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    295.88 100.34 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    295.74 100.29 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    295.50 100.21 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    295.48 100.21 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    295.23 100.12 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    294.90 100.01 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    294.87 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    294.79 99.97 %
      more is better


    Crytography

    SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - AES 256
    Review Rating
    GB/sec Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    7.14 102.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    7.12 101.71 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    7.11 101.57 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    7.11 101.57 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    7.09 101.29 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    7.08 101.14 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    7.07 101.00 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    7.00 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    7.00 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    7.00 100.00 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    7.00 100.00 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    7.00 100.00 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    7.00 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    7.00 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    7.00 100.00 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    6.20 88.57 %
      more is better


    SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - SHA 256
    Review Rating
    MB/sec Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    1.21 100.83 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    1.21 100.83 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    1.21 100.83 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    1.20 100.00 %
      more is better


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums

    [pagebreak]

    SiSoft Sandra 2

    At this point we deliver the values regarding Memory Bandwidth, Memory Latency as well as Memory and Cache Access.

    Memory bandwidth

    SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - Integer
    Review Rating
    GB/sec Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    22.07 101.01 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    22.02 100.78 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    22.00 100.69 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    22.00 100.69 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    22.00 100.69 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    22.00 100.69 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    21.92 100.32 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    21.87 100.09 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    21.85 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    21.83 99.91 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    21.82 99.86 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    21.81 99.82 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    21.78 99.68 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    21.76 99.59 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    21.75 99.54 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    19.20 87.87 %
      more is better


    SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - floating point
    Review Rating
    GB/sec Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    22.01 100.78 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    22.00 100.73 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    22.00 100.73 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    22.00 100.73 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    22.00 100.73 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    22.00 100.73 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    21.92 100.37 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    21.90 100.27 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    21.87 100.14 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    21.84 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    21.83 99.95 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    21.82 99.91 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    21.81 99.86 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    21.79 99.77 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    21.73 99.54 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    19.20 87.91 %
      more is better


    Memory latency

    SiSoft Sandra - Memory latency
    Review Rating
    ns Percent
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    21.2 100.94 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    21.3 100.47 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    21.3 100.47 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    21.4 100.00 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    21.4 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    21.5 99.53 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    21.5 99.53 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    22.3 95.96 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    23.1 92.64 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    23.1 92.64 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    23.9 89.54 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    23.9 89.54 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    23.9 89.54 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    23.9 89.54 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    25.6 83.59 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    26.0 82.31 %
      less is better more is better


    Memory and cache access

    SiSoft Sandra - Memory and cache access
    Review Rating
    GB/sec Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    120.49 101.01 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    120.31 100.86 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    120.15 100.73 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    119.99 100.60 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    119.88 100.50 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    119.68 100.34 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    119.65 100.31 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    119.56 100.23 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    119.39 100.09 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    119.33 100.04 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    119.28 100.00 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    119.24 99.97 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    119.19 99.92 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    118.89 99.67 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    118.52 99.36 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    114.40 95.91 %
      more is better


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums

    [pagebreak]

    UC Bench

    UC Bench
    Review Rating
    PW/sec Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    889.9 100.74 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    889.7 100.71 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    889.8 100.72 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    889.6 100.70 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    889.2 100.66 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    889.1 100.65 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    888.4 100.56 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    887.9 100.51 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    885.0 100.18 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    885.0 100.18 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    884.8 100.16 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    884.8 100.16 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    884.8 100.16 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    883.4 100.00 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    882.6 99.91 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    882.5 99.90 %
      more is better



    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums [pagebreak]

    Super Pi 1M - 32M

    Meanwhile Super Pi even in its latest version has become pretty old. Never the less it is able to show scaling to the clock speed nicely.

    Super Pi 1M

    Super Pi 1.5 XS - 1M
    Review Rating
    sec Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    10.311 100.92 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    10.327 100.76 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    10.327 100.76 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    10.329 100.75 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    10.359 100.45 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    10.374 100.31 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    10.374 100.31 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    10.374 100.31 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    10.374 100.31 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    10.390 100.15 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    10.390 100.15 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    10.405 100.01 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    10.406 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    10.406 100.00 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    10.420 99.87 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    10.467 99.42 %
      less is better more is better
     

    Super Pi 32M

    Super Pi 1.5 XS - 32M
    Review Rating
    sec Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    558.528 101.07 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    558.887 101.00 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    559.714 100.86 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    559.853 100.83 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    560.384 100.74 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    560.868 100.65 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    560.961 100.63 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    561.071 100.51 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    562.257 100.40 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    562.771 100.31 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    562.959 100.27 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    564.503 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    564.643 99.98 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    564.648 99.97 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    566.187 99.70 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    571.429 98.79 %
      less is better more is better


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums [pagebreak]

    wPrime 1024M Multicore

    wPrime is based on a multithreaded algorithm to calculate the square root to up to 32 billion digits. Therefore it is possible to put 100 percent load on every core or thread and to see differences between architectures.

    wPrime - 1024M Multi Core
    Review Rating
    sec Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    210.026 100.78 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    210.066 100.76 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    210.100 100.74 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    210.212 100.69 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    210.243 100.67 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    210.334 100.63 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    210.690 100.46 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    211.134 100.25 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    211.162 100.24 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    211.176 100.23 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    211.225 100.20 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    211.394 100.13 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    211.659 100.00 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    211.992 99.84 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    212.099 99.79 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    214.123 98.85 %
      less is better more is better



    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums

    [pagebreak]

    Games

    Crysis 800 x 600, low details

    Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

    Crysis DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)
    Review Rating
    fps Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    179.14 107.71 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    174.05 104.65 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    173.23 104.15 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    168.11 101.08 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    167.32 100.60 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    167.05 100.44 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    166.495 100.10 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    166.32 100.00 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    165.97 99.79 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    165.66 99.60 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    165.00 99.21 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    163.91 98.55 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    162.97 97.99 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    162.32 97.59 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    162.20 97.52 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    160.72 96.63 %
      more is better


    Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

    Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 benchmark we can again show CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

    Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)
    Review Rating
    fps Percent
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    221.4 100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    219.5 99.14 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    218.7 98.78 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    218.5 98.69 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    217.7 98.33 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    215.7 97.43 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    215.7 97.43 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    215.7 97.43 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    213.2 96.30 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    212.6 96.03 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    211.9 95.71 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    211.6 95.57 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    207.7 93.81 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    207.3 93.63 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    207.2 93.59 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    201.5 91.01 %
      more is better


    Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

    Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

    Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)
    Review Rating
    fps Percent
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    832.85 106.43 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    810.15 103.53 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    808.12 103.27 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    806.81 103.11 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    803.92 102.74 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    802.43 102.55 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    802.37 102.54 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    801.05 102.37 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    797.67 101.94 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    795.52 101.66 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    789.76 100.93 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    783.26 100.10 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    782.50 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    780.81 99.78 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    780.76 99.78 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    766.45 97.95 %
      more is better


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums

    [pagebreak]

    Power Consumption

    Idle

    Idle
    Review Rating
    Watt Percent
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    84 123.81 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    90 115.56 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    93 111.83 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    94 110.64 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    96 108.33 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    98 106.12 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    98 106.12 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    100 104.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    101 102.97 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    102 101.96 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    104 100.00 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    108 96.30 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    110 94.55 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    114 91.23 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    118 88.14 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    121 85.95 %
      less is better more is better


    Load

    Load
    Review Rating
    Watt Percent
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    136 108.82 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    137 108.03 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    138 107.25 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    138 107.25 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    142 104.23 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    144 102.78 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    145 102.07 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    146 101.37 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    147 100.68 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    148 100.00 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    149 99.33 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    150 98.67 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    151 98.01 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    155 95.48 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    163 90.80 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    164 90.24 %
      less is better more is better



    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums

    [pagebreak]

    Performance Rating

    3D and Gaming Benchmarks
    Review Rating
    Percent
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    101.10 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    100.82 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    100.40 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    100.28 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    100.21 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    100.21 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    100.15 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    100.14 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    100.13 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    99.97 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    99.65 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    99.27 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    99.19 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    98.97 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    98.97 %
      more is better


    2D Benchmarks
    Review Rating
    Percent
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    100.47 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    100.40 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    100.10 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    100.01 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    100.04 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    99.98 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    99.92 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    99.84 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    99.82 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    99.78 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    99.58 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    99.41 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    99.26 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    99.21 %
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    96.73 %
      more is better


    Performance per Watt
    Review Rating
    Percent
    ASUS P8H77-I
    No Review
    84.13 %
    ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
    No Review
    89.75 %
    ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
    No Review
    91.08 %
    ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    No Review
    92.07 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V
    No Review
    93.56 %
    Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
    No Review
    94.88 %
    Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
    No Review
    96.35 %
    ASUS Maximus V Extreme
    No Review
    97.49 %
    ASUS Maximus V Gene
    No Review
    97.79 %
    ASUS Sabertooth Z77
    No Review
    97.84 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    No Review
    98.84 %
    Intel DZ77GA-70K
    No Review
    100.00 %
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    No Review
    104.06 %
    Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
    No Review
    107.16 %
    ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
    No Review
    112.60 %
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    No Review
    112.77 %
      less is better


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



    Discuss this article in the forums[pagebreak]

    Conclusion

    Allgemein   + -
    The first impression the Maximus V Extreme from ASUS leaves, makes us want more. Once again we like the ROG design, which meanwhile belongs to the evergreens in the industry. Furthermore there are four PCI Express 3.0 slots which make this board future proof. On the "Extreme" side we find for example the OC-key. This little device lets you monitor all the system readouts onscreen. What you're also going to find are connectors for professional temperature sensors, which allow accurate temperature monitoring. This is especially useful for extreme overclocking where you have tempetures which go all the way down to -196°C or even lower.   - Design
    - 4 x PCI-Express 3.0 Slot
    - OC-key
    - Professional temperature sensors - VGA Hotwire
     
           
    Layout   + -

    Basically the ASUS Maximus V Extreme's Layout has been very well thought. Once more practical are the angled SATA connectors as well as the power- and reset-buttons. There is also a debug display which is very useful in case you should have issues with a component in your system or the board itself. Even the placement of the PCI-Express x16 is very well chosen. There is a total of five of these slots, whereas red ones can access eight lanes each when there are graphics cards in every slot. This is possible because of a PLX bridge chip that splits the incoming 16 lanes to 32 lanes. We also liked the voltage readouts as well as the possibility that one can deactivate the different PCI-Express x16 expansion slots via dip switches. The Maximus V Extreme really seems to be a very complete overclocking motherboard.

      - Angled SATA connectors - Power/Reset-Button onboard
    - Debug display
    - Space around the CPU socket - Voltage readouts
     
           
    Performance   + -
    With the Maximus V Extreme, ASUS has a motherboard in its portfolio, which shows exceptionally solid benchmark results. The performance was very good concerning 3DMark 11, 3DMark 01, SiSoftSandra, SuperPi 1M, SuperPi 32M and wPrime 1024M. You can find only one performance glitches with Resident Evil. A closer look at the power consumption on the other hand shows that this is a board with a lot of features. High power consumption is typical for this kind of motherboard. Therefore it is no surprise that you can find this board almost at the bottom third of our comparison tables when it comes to power consumption.   - 3DMark 11 Total
    - 3DMark 01
    - SiSoft Sandra
    - SuperPi 1M
    - SuperPi 32M
    - wPrime 1024M
    - Resident Evil
           
    BIOS / Overclocking   + -
    These day ASUS is also a byword for exceptionally good BIOS'es. It has everything it needs to have and even more. There is a very nice design, an easy to understand structure and setting for everything you might want to adjust or change. Even overclockers find a lot of new settings to play with. There are for example all the memory presets, which are great if you want to achieve good results quickly. In the end it has been childrens play to reach the clock wall of our test CPU.   - Well structured BIOS - UEFI-BIOS
    - Overclocking
    - Too many options/settings, we love that!
     
           
    Recommendation   + -
    If you want to build an absolute high end comptuer or an overclocking rig, which is based on Intels Ivy Bridge CPU then the Maximus V Extreme is one of the very best choices for this purpose.   - High-End
    - Gaming
    - Overclocking
    - Normal people
           
    Rating
    We give the Maximus V Extreme excellent five out of five stars.



    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7  


    Discuss this article in the forums [pagebreak]

    Personal Opinion

    In our reviews we try to focus on facts, based on which a customer can come to a conclusion himself whether he thinks a certain product is suitable for him or not. Our experience is, that with reviews like this we run into the situation of not seeing discussions at all. It is quite understandable because there is not much to talk about except facts, but that's kind of boring. So what to do about this? We decided to add a page dedicated to the editors personal opinion about the product. For example: sometimes it is the case that based on the facts the product is good, but there are some rather difficult to explain things which make a product "strange" or on the other hand "exciting". So be prepared for some more words on this page and as I'm not a native English speaker, some really weird phrases
    These days ASUS offers some of the very best boards across all market segments. It is almost unbelievable how this company dominates the motherboard market at the moment. With the Maximus V Extreme they almost celebrate their domination. More features, more performance, ... I could start make another list of facts here, but that's not what I want to write about here. Instead I mention only one thing. One could think that the "outta space and not on this planet overclockers" who design these products only think about the fun factor for people with purses fatter than any huge sandwhich but no. For example the 3.3 Volt Generator is actually a very neat idea for people who own a power supply that struggles to power let's say a 2 way SLI/CF system. In such a situation it is well possible that the 3.3 Volt rail of this guys power supply doesn't have enough grunt to keep the system alive under load conditions. What ASUS does here is, they take the voltage from the much stronger 12 Volt rail and modulate it onboard to get a stable 3.3 Volt supply only for the PCI Express slots. Neat, isn't it?

    And holy cow ... thank god there is a company that doesn't catch up with every marketing hype like weapon coolers or offending marketing campaigns. It seems like they have better ideas about what to do with their research and development money then that. For example they hire two of this planets most reknown - I don't know if legendary would be more appropriate here - overclockers called Andre Yang and Shamino. It is thanks to guys like them that todays BIOS'es an boards offer so many settings and features. Sometimes, when I see presets for every single DRAM chip, I really start asking myself whether Asia is on another planet than Europe. I mean testing and optimizing all those timings really takes a lot of time. And then there are settings in the BIOS like "Xtreme Tweaking" and "SPI Booster", which I'd call an adequate kick in the butt for 3DMark 01 and SuperPi.

    I don't know if it's because this is the first time I'm doing this kind of writing about a product but it feels like I could keep going on for ages. But let's finish it here with kind of a closing remark. From the unboxing to the standard benchmarks to the overclocking the Maximus V Extreme (MVE) has been able to convince me. It isn't a board that just does the job when you take it out of the box it excels almost everywhere. In the end there are only two questions left: what does this thing cost and when can I buy it?


    Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
    Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
    Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
    Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
    Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
    Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
    Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
    Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
    Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
    Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
    Page 11 - PC Mark 7