HD 7970 CrossFire Gaming Performance: AMD Catalyst 12.6 Beta
Category : ATI/AMD
Published by Christian Ney on 08.06.12
Following we present to you our driver performance analysis on AMD's latest Radeon HD 7970 in dual card CrossFire configuration. This time we tested our benchmarking/gaming setup with four different Catalyst drivers. Featuring the Catalyst 11.12, 11.12 RC11, 12.4 and the latest beta available the Catalyst 12.6 Beta from June 4th. Let's see how they do perform.
Introduction
Find all the benchmarks/games results on the following pages.
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Test Setup
Hardware
Mainboard |
- ASUS P8P67 Pro (BIOS 2303)
|
CPUs |
- Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.4 GHz (Turbo Off / HT On)
|
Memory |
- G.Skill RipjawsZ Dual Channel 4x4GB CL9-9-9-24-DDR3-1600 MHz
|
Graphic Cards (Driver) |
- AMD Radeon HD 7970
CrossFire
- XFX Radeon HD 7970 (XFX Double Dissipation)
|
Drivers |
- Catalyst 8.921.0.0 (Catalyst 11.12) (December 3 2011) (First Retail Drivers) (Found in the HD 7970
Retail Box)
- Catalyst 8.921.2 (Catalyst 11.12 RC11) (December 20 2012) (Found
in the HD 7970 Retail Box)
- Catalyst 12.4 (April 6 2012)
- Catalyst 12.6 (Unofficial Beta June 4 2012) (8.980.0)
|
HDD |
- Samsung SSD 830 Series 128 GB
|
PSU
|
- Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP / 1000 Watts
|
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Benchmarks and Games Settings
Futuremark
- 3DMark 11
(1.0.3)
- GPU Test - Performance Preset
- 3DMark Vantage (1.1.0)
- GPU Test - Performance Preset
Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark
|
|
Version |
3.0 |
API |
DirectX 11 |
Tessellation |
Extreme |
Shaders |
High |
Anisotropy |
16x |
Stereo
3D |
Disabled |
Anti-aliasing |
8x |
Full
Screen |
Yes |
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Geeks3D TessMark
|
|
Version |
0.3.0 |
Map Set |
Set 4 (2048 x 204 |
Tesselation |
Insane (x64) |
Full
Screen |
Yes |
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Anti-aliasing |
8x |
Tessellation |
High |
Duration |
60000 (ms) |
Geeks3D FurMark (Burn-in test)
|
|
Version |
1.10.0 |
Full
Screen |
Yes |
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Anti-aliasing |
8x MSAA |
Alien vs Predator DX11 Benchmark
|
|
Texture Quality |
Very High |
Shadow Quality |
High |
Hardware Tesselation |
Yes |
Advance Shadow Sampling |
Yes |
Full Srceen Anti-Aliasing Samples |
4x |
Anisotropic Filtering |
16x |
SSAO |
On |
Screen Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Batman: Arkham City Integrated Benchmark
|
|
FullScreen |
Yes |
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
V Sync |
No |
Anti-Aliasing |
8x MSAA |
Stereoscopic 3D Status |
No |
DirectX 11 Features |
MVSS And HBAO |
DirectX 11 Tesselation |
High |
Detail Level |
Extreme |
Dynamic Shadow |
Yes |
Motion Blur |
Yes |
Distortion |
Yes |
Lens Flares |
Yes |
Light Shafts |
Yes |
Reflections |
Yes |
Ambient Occlusion |
Yes |
Hardware Accelerated PhysX |
Off |
Call Of Duty Modern Warfare 3 (5 Minutes GamePlay)
|
|
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
FullScreen |
On |
Vertical Sync |
Off |
Field of view |
70 |
Motion Blur Amount |
Max |
Graphics Quality |
Ultra |
BattleField 3 (5 Minutes GamePlay)
|
|
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Aspect Ratio |
Wide 16:9 |
Anti-Aliasing |
4x |
Screen Refresh Rate |
60 Hz |
Sync Every Frame |
No |
Shadows |
Yes |
Specular Map |
Yes |
Depth Of Field |
Yes |
Screen Space Ambient Occlusion |
High Quality |
Soften Smoke Edges |
Yes |
Bullet Impacts |
Yes |
Image Quality |
Ultra |
Crysis 2 DX11 + HiRes Texture Pack Benchmark
|
|
Quality |
Ultra |
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Anti-Aliasing |
4x |
Map |
Central Park/Adrenaline |
Runs |
1 |
API |
DirectX 11 |
Edge AA |
Edge AA |
Hi-Res Textures |
On |
DIRT 2 Integrated Benchmark
|
|
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Refresh Rate |
60 |
MultiSampling |
8x MSAA |
VSync |
Off |
Aspect Ration |
16:9 |
Details |
Ultra Preset |
Dragon Age II (5 Minutes GamePlay)
|
|
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Full Screen Mode |
Yes |
Renderer |
DirectX 11 |
Vertical Sync |
no |
Graphics Detail |
Very High |
Anti-Aliasing |
8x |
Anisotropic Filtering |
16x |
Screen Space Ambient Occlusion |
Yes |
Diffusion Depth of Field |
Yes |
High Quality Blur |
Yes |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (5 Minutes GamePlay)
|
|
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Aspect Ratio |
Wide 16:9 |
Anti-Aliasing |
8x |
Anisotropic-Filtering |
16x |
Details |
Ultra |
Vertical Sync |
Disabled |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat Benchmark
|
|
Preset |
Ultra |
Renderer |
Enhan. full dyn. lighting (DX11) |
Video Mode |
1920 x 1080 |
MSAA |
4x |
MSAA for A-tested objects |
DX10.0 Style [Standard] |
SSAO Mode |
HDAO |
SSAO Quality |
High |
Use DX10.1 |
No |
Enable Tesselation |
Yes |
Contact Hardening Shadows |
Yes |
StarCraft II (5 Minutes GamePlay)
|
|
Display Mode |
Fullscreen |
Refresh Rate |
Default |
Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
Vertical Sync |
No |
Texture Quality |
Ultra |
Graphics Quality |
Ultra |
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Unigine Heaven
TessMark
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Alien vs Predator
Batman: Arkham City
DIRT 2
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3
BattleField 3
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Crysis 2
Dragon Age 2
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
StarCarft 2
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Power Consumption
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Benchmark Summary
Synthetic Benchmarks
Games
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Performance Index
Higher is better
Discuss this article in the forums
[pagebreak]
Conclusion
A
direct comparison between driver version 12.6 from june 6 and the WHQL driver
version 12.4 shows only a little improvement in performance. Under some games
more than others as we found -3.2 % in performance in the wrose case and +14.05
% in the best. A closer look at the synthetic benchmarks shows that
there is a noticeable performance increase in 3DMark 11 where the score is 1.09 % higher.
Otherwise there
is almost no difference at all. But still it's good to know for overclockers, that
the latest drivers can help increase benchmarking performance by a small margin.
Concerning TessMark we saw a 2.5 times increase when we compare driver version
11.12 and 12.6 to version 11.12, which also explains why our
performance ratio regarding the synthetic 3D benchmarks shows an increase of 45
percent with the latest drivers. AMD has made major improvements concerning tessellation compared to
the first drivers that supported the Radeon HD 7970.
Shifting the focus to games there is also a noticeable increase in performance.
In our performance rating we see an average increase of 15 percent compared to
the first retail drivers and 1.5 percent compared to the Catalyst 12.4. Going from
Catalyst 12.4 to 12.6 Beta you will see an improvement especially and only in The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.
There is no
less than 14 percent gain in performance but the performance still aren't good
for a CrossFire setup as it's performing way lower than with a single graphics
card.
Interesting is also the power consumption. We measured our testsystems power
consumption under idle and load conditions. When there was no load the system
needed 77 Watt when the 12.4 driver were installed. With the 12.6 Beta driver the
system needed only 66 Watts to run. Therefore power efficiency increased by a
whopping 14.3 percent under idle conditions. But we didn't see any improvement
this time under load conditions.
Keeping your dirvers up-to-date
is really important if you're a gamer because you benefit not only from better
performance but also from increased energy efficiency. And we have to say, those
Catalyst drivers 12.6 Unofficial Beta from June 4 are the best AMD drivers so
far.
Discuss this article in the forums