Affordable Intel CPUs with a free multiplyer, that was something you were looking for in vain until now but with the K-series Intel now offers a very overclocking friendly processors which comes at a reasonable price. For us this is reason enough to be curious about this products performance and especially its overclockability.
How
Intels 875 K CPU fights it's way though our benchmarking parcours and how good
it can be overclocked that's what we uncover on the following pages.
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Specifications
|
i5 750 |
i7 870 |
i7 875 K |
i7 975 XE |
i7 980 X |
Codename |
Lynnfield |
Lynnfield |
Lynnfield |
Nehalem |
Nehalem |
Socket |
LGA 1156 |
LGA 1156 |
LGA 1156 |
LGA 1366 |
LGA 1366 |
Manufacturing |
45 nm |
45 nm |
45 nm |
45 nm |
32 nm |
Transistors |
774 Mio |
774 Mio |
774 Mio |
731 Mio |
1.17 Bio |
Die-size |
296 mm2 |
296 mm2 |
296 mm2 |
263 mm2 |
248 mm2 |
Clock |
2.66 GHz |
2.93 GHz |
2.93 GHz |
3.33 GHz |
3.33 GHz |
Cores |
4C / 4T |
4C / 8T |
4C / 8T |
4C / 8T |
6C / 12T |
Turbo |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes (+266 MHz) |
Yes (+266 MHz) |
Bus Speed |
133 MHz |
133 MHz |
133 MHz |
133 MHz |
133 MHz |
Memory |
DDR3 |
DDR3 |
DDR3 |
DDR3 |
DDR3 |
Memory controller |
Dual Channel |
Dual Channel |
Dual Channel |
Triple Channel |
Triple Channel |
QPI |
4.26 GT/s |
4.26 GT/s |
4.26 GT/s |
6.4 GT/s |
6.4 GT/s |
L1 Execution Cache |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
L1 Data Cache |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
32 KByte |
L2 Cache |
256 KByte |
256 KByte |
256 KByte |
256 KByte |
256 KByte |
L3 Cache |
8 MB shared |
8 MB shared |
8 MB shared |
8 MB shared |
12 MB shared |
TDP |
95 Watt |
95 Watt |
95 Watt |
130 Watt |
130 Watt |
C1E technology |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Enhanced Intel Speed Step |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Virtualisation |
Vanderpool |
Vanderpool |
Vanderpool |
Vanderpool |
Vanderpool |
Instruction sets |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Die Lynnfield CPU
With
Lynnfield Intel presents Bloomfields smaller brother which should show it's
muscles especially in the mainstream market. In direct comparison to Bloomfield,
Lynnfield is equipped with a dual-channel instead of a triple-channel memory
interface. The i5 models have no hyperthreading but every single Lynnfield CPU
comes with an enhanced Turbo-Mode. Intels arguments for a Turbo-Mode which is
able to dynamically overclock the CPU by up to 666 MHz or in other words five
multiplyer stpes is, that most of the software on the market is still not
optimized for multithreaded CPUs and therefore the user mainly profits from
higher clock speeds than massive parallelism.
Already with the Bloomfield Intel has been very proud of the
scalability of Nehalems architecture, respectively the relative easyness to
adapt the architecture to different markets. As a consequence it isn't a
surprise that there weren't many changes on the "Die" itself. The only
conspicuity is the fact that the Lynnfield CPUs carry about 40 million more
transistors than their Bloomfield equivalents.
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Test setup
Mainboards |
- ASUS P6T Deluxe (Intel)
- ASUS Crosshair IV Formula (AMD)
|
CPUs |
- AMD Phenom II X6 1090T, 3.2 GHz
- Intel Core i7 980 X, 3.33 GHz
- Intel Core i7 975 XE, 3.33 GHz
- Intel Core i7 965 XE, 3.20 GHz
- Intel Core i7 950, 3.06 GHz
- Intel Core i7 940, 2.93 GHz
- Intel Core i7 920, 2.66 GHz
- Intel Core i7 875, 2.93 GHz
- Intel Core i7 870, 2.93 GHz
- Intel Core i5 750, 2.66 GHz
|
Speicher |
- Corsair Dominator TR3X3G1600C8D CL 8-8-8-24, 3 x 2 GByte (Intel)
- Corsair Dominator TR3X3G1600C8D CL 8-8-8-24, 2 x 2 GByte (AMD)
|
Grafikkarten |
|
Festplatte |
- Samsung Spinpoint F1 640 GByte
|
Netzteil |
- Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050 Watt
|
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
3DMark 06
3DMark 06 is getting older these days. Therefore if you are using
really powerful graphic cards you will hit CPU limitation which means that the
graphic card isn't the bottleneck in the system. This is also the reason why in
recent high-end desktop systems 3DMark 06 scales nicely with the CPU and the
graphic card has much less influence on the scores.
Total
3DMark 06 Total |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
20'380 |
133.39 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
18'825 |
123.22 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
18'368 |
120.23 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
17'729 |
116.04 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
17'617 |
115.31 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17'463 |
114.30 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17'330 |
113.43 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
16'218 |
106.15 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
16'197 |
106.02 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
15'688 |
102.68 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
15'278 |
100.00 % |
|
more is better |
CPU
3DMark 06 CPU |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
7'466 |
158.35 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
6'007 |
127.40 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
5'908 |
125.30 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
5'539 |
117.48 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
5'529 |
117.26 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
5'329 |
113.02 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
5'166 |
109.57 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
5'118 |
108.54 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
4'715 |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
4'527 |
104.15 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
4'242 |
89.97 % |
|
more is better |
3DMark Vantage
3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of
a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10,
FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and
different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems
struggle.
Total
3DMark Vantage Total |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
14'184 |
109.57 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
13'506 |
104.33 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13'391 |
103.45 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13'256 |
102.40 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13'250 |
102.36 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13'183 |
101.84 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
12'949 |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
12'945 |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
12'715 |
98.22 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
12'035 |
92.97 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
11'444 |
88.40 % |
|
more is better |
CPU
3DMark Vantage CPU |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
32'154 |
189.25 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
21'472 |
126.38 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
20'078 |
118.18 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19'921 |
117.25 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19'285 |
113.51 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
18'444 |
108.56 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
18'605 |
109.51 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
16'990 |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
16'407 |
96.57 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
12'791 |
75.29 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
11'054 |
67.37 % |
|
more is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Cinebench
The test procedure consists of two
main components: The first test sequence is dedicated to the computer's main
processor. A 3D scene file is used to render a photoreaslistic image. The scene
makes use of various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient
occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders. During the first run the
benchmark only uses one CPU (or CPU core) to ascertain a reference value. On
computers that have multiple CPUs or CPU cores and on those that simulate
multiple CPUs (via HyperThreading or similar technolgies), Cinebench will run a
second test using all available CPU power.
1 CPU
Cinebench R10 1 CPU |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
174 sec |
78.03 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
178 sec |
79.82 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
180 sec |
80.72 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
187 sec |
83.86 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
195 sec |
87.44 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
198 sec |
88.79 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
203 sec |
91.03 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
207 sec |
92.83 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
223 sec |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
225 sec |
100.89 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
237 sec |
106.28 % |
|
less is better |
X CPU
Cinebench R10 X CPU |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
31 sec |
56.36 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
43 sec |
78.18 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
47 sec |
85.45 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
48 sec |
87.27 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
48 sec |
87.27 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
50 sec |
90.10 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
52 sec |
94.54 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
52 sec |
94.54 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
55 sec |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
63 sec |
114.55 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
66 sec |
83.33 % |
|
less is better |
POV-Ray 3.7
Pov-Ray is a raytracer which comes with an integrated
benchmark routine that allows CPU single- and multicore performacne. Therefore a
predefined 3D-Scene is being rendered twice by the CPU and as a result you get a
PPS (Pixel per Secon) value.
Singlethread
POV-Ray Singlethread |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
932.21 PPS |
138.40 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
907.25 PPS |
134.69 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
865.92 PPS |
128.56 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
864.52 PPS |
128.35 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
807.34 PPS |
119.86 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
796.06 PPS |
118.19 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
792.85 PPS |
117.71 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
776.52 PPS |
115.29 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
748.13 PPS |
110.08 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
734.09 PPS |
108.99 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
673.56 PPS |
100.00 % |
|
more is better |
Multithread
POV-Ray Multithreaded |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
6'594.00 PPS |
178.93 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
4'660.01 PPS |
139.79 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
4'342.65 PPS |
130.27 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
4'309.88 PPS |
129.29 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
4'003.79 PPS |
120.11 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'840.94 PPS |
115.22 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'685.11 PPS |
100.55 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
3'605.33 PPS |
108.54 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
3'333.51 PPS |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
3'126.46 PPS |
93.79 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
2'672.07 PPS |
80.16 % |
|
more is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
SiSoft Sandra 1
SiSoft
Sandra is a theoretical multi purpose benchmark suite which is able to show
differences in CPU architectures. We split the tests with SiSoft Sandra into two
parts. Therefore on this page you'll find Arithmetic-, Multimedia- and
Cryptography-benchmarks.
Arithmetik
SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetik -
Drystone |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
153.00 GIPS |
240.72 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
82.58 GIPS |
129.92 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
76.77 GIPS |
120.78 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
76.30 GIPS |
120.04 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
73.16 GIPS |
115.10 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
71.68 GIPS |
112.78 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
69.91 GIPS |
109.99 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
68.53 GIPS |
107.81 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
65.56 GIPS |
103.15 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
63.56 GIPS |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
44.71 GIPS |
70.34 % |
|
more is better |
SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetik -
Whetstone |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
130.72 GFLOPS |
234.64 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
71.95 GFLOPS |
129.15 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
66.70 GFLOPS |
119.72 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
64.17 GFLOPS |
116.31 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
61.40 GFLOPS |
110.21 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
61.29 GFLOPS |
110.02 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
59.28 GFLOPS |
106.41 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
55.71 GFLOPS |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
55.55 GFLOPS |
99.71 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
36.88 GFLOPS |
66.20 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
31.97 GFLOPS |
60.98 % |
|
more is better |
Multimedia
SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia -
Integer |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
279.17 MPixel/s |
206.93 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
222.85 MPixel/s |
165.18 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
175.93 MPixel/s |
130.40 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
162.22 MPixel/s |
120.24 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
162.11 MPixel/s |
120.16 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
155.65 MPixel/s |
115.37 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
150.19 MPixel/s |
111.32 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
148.78 MPixel/s |
110.28 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
134.91 MPixel/s |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
149.22 MPixel/s |
90.41 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
116.72 MPixel/s |
86.52 % |
|
more is better |
SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia -
Fliesskomma |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
210.19 MPixel/s |
201.62 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
137.16 MPixel/s |
131.57 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
135.49 MPixel/s |
129.97 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
125.15 MPixel/s |
120.05 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
125.10 MPixel/s |
120.00 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
119.90 MPixel/s |
115.01 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
114.74 MPixel/s |
110.06 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
114.44 MPixel/s |
109.78 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
104.25 MPixel/s |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
91.48 MPixel/s |
87.75 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
90.02 MPixel/s |
86.35 % |
|
more is better |
Crytography
SiSoft Sandra - Kryptographie - AES
256 |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
11'000 MB/s |
2282.16 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
724 MB/s |
150.21 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
625 MB/s |
129.67 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
579 MB/s |
120.12 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
573 MB/s |
118.88 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
554 MB/s |
114.94 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
530 MB/s |
109.96 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
528 MB/s |
109.54 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
484 MB/s |
100.41 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
482 MB/s |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
456 MB/s |
94.61 % |
|
more is better |
SiSoft Sandra - Kryptographie - SHA
256 |
|
Percent |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
592 MB/s |
132.44 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
1'032 MB/s |
230.87 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
887 MB/s |
198.43 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
581 MB/s |
129.98 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
537 MB/s |
120.13 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
536 MB/s |
119.91 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
522 MB/s |
116.78 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
514 MB/s |
114.99 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
513 MB/s |
114.77 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
492 MB/s |
110.07 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
447 MB/s |
100.00 % |
|
more is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
SiSoft Sandra 2
At this point we deliver the values
regarding Memory Bandwidth, Memory Latency as well as Memory and Cache Access.
Memory bandwidth
SiSoft Sandra - Speicherbandbreite
- Integer |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
26.62 GB/s |
101.41 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
26.60 GB/s |
101.33 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.54 GB/s |
101.10 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.48 GB/s |
100.88 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.40 GB/s |
100.57 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
26.25 GB/s |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.64 GB/s |
74.82 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
14.95 GB/s |
56.95 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
14.51 GB/s |
55.28 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
13.36 GB/s |
50.90 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13.00 GB/s |
49.52 % |
|
more is better |
SiSoft Sandra - Speicherbandbreite
- Fliesskomma |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
26.58 GB/s |
101.33 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
26.56 GB/s |
101.26 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.58 GB/s |
101.33 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.49 GB/s |
100.99 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
26.40 GB/s |
100.65 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
26.23 GB/s |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.64 GB/s |
74.88 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
15.10 GB/s |
57.57 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
14.62 GB/s |
55.74 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
13.36 GB/s |
50.93 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13.00 GB/s |
49.56 % |
|
more is better |
Memory latency
SiSoft Sandra - Speicherlatenz |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
62 ns |
93.93 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
63 ns |
95.45 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
63 ns |
95.45 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
64 ns |
96.97 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
65 ns |
98.48 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
66 ns |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
68 ns |
103.03 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
80 ns |
121.21 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
81 ns |
122.72 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
82 ns |
124.24 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
82 ns |
124.24 % |
|
less is better |
Memory and cache access
SiSoft Sandra - Speicher und Cache
Zugriff |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
98.67 GB/s |
146.37 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
78.06 GB/s |
115.80 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.66 GB/s |
110.76 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
72.89 GB/s |
108.13 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
71.05 GB/s |
105.40 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
71.00 GB/s |
105.33 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
67.54 GB/s |
100.19 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
67.41 GB/s |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
57.69 GB/s |
85.58 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
53.94 GB/s |
80.02 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
51.00 GB/s |
75.66 % |
|
more is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Super Pi
Meanwhile Super
Pi even in its latest version has become pretty old. Never the less it is able
to show scaling to the clock speed nicely.
1M
Super Pi 1.5 XS - 1M |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
11.589 sec |
76.66 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
11.700 sec |
77.40 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
11.700 sec |
77.40 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
12.636 sec |
83.59 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13.177 sec |
87.17 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13.260 sec |
87.71 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
13.760 sec |
91.02 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
13.975 sec |
92.45 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
15.117 sec |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
19.376 sec |
128.17 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
21.466 sec |
142.00 % |
|
less is better |
32M
Super Pi 1.5 XS - 32M |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
635.233 sec |
79.43 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
635.701 sec |
79.48 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
631.426 sec |
78.95 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
678.429 sec |
84.83 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
683.795 sec |
85.50 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
701.328 sec |
87.69 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
707.463 sec |
88.08 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
734.089 sec |
91.79 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
799.781 sec |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
1173.496 sec |
146.73 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
1294.459 sec |
161.85 % |
|
less is better |
wPrime
wPrime is based on a
multithreaded algorithm to calculate the square root to up to 32 billion digits.
Therefore it is possible to put 100 percent load on every core or thread and to
see differences between architectures.
32M
wPrime - 32M |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
35.132 sec |
76.16 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHz DDR3-1600 |
35.338 sec |
76.61 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
35.406 sec |
76.75 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
36.786 sec |
79.74 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
38.297 sec |
83.02 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
39.243 sec |
85.07 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
39.965 sec |
86.64 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
40.395 sec |
87.07 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
41.901 sec |
90.85 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
45.771 sec |
99.22 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
46.130 sec |
100.00 % |
|
less is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
WinRAR
WinRAR is a well known archivier. It is highly efficient and
it also comes with an integrated benchmark routine. We also do a real world
application be archiving a folder which exists on the hard drive.
Integer Test
WinRAR - Interger Test |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
3'998 KB/sec |
113.61 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
3'929 KB/sec |
111.65 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'849 KB/sec |
109.38 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'738 KB/sec |
106.22 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'694 KB/sec |
104.97 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
3'519 KB/sec |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
3'465 KB/sec |
98.47 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
3'251 KB/sec |
92.38 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
2'905 KB/sec |
82.55 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
2'395 KB/sec |
68.06 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
2'395 KB/sec |
68.06 % |
|
more is better |
Folder compression
WinRAR - Ordner Kompression (669
Dateien / 32 Ordner / 694 MB) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
122 sec |
82.99 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
130 sec |
88.43 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
135 sec |
91.83 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
138 sec |
93.88 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
141 sec |
95.91 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
147 sec |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
174 sec |
118.37 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
175 sec |
119.05 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
181 sec |
123.13 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
190 sec |
129.25 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
215 sec |
146.63 % |
|
less is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Crysis DirectX10
Crysis is still one of the games which has very high
system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API,
High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion
Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9
as well as DirectX10 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If
we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence
compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.
Crysis DirectX10
800 x 600, low details
Crysis DirectX10 (800 x 600 low
details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
156.42 fps |
124.64 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
146.41 fps |
116.66 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
139.91 fps |
111.48 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
135.65 fps |
108.09 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
132.60 fps |
105.66 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
125.50 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
122.66 fps |
97.74 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
109.52 fps |
87.67 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
107.91 fps |
85.98 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
90.35 fps |
71.99 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
89.77 fps |
71.53 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, very high details, 16x AA
Crysis DirectX10 (1920 x 1080 high
details, 16x AA) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
24.65 fps |
125.57 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
19.79 fps |
100.79 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.74 fps |
100.58 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.72 fps |
100.48 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.69 fps |
100.26 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
19.63 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
19.55 fps |
99.59 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
19.35 fps |
98.57 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
19.32 fps |
98.42 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
17.15 fps |
87.37 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
17.03 fps |
86.75 % |
|
more is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10
PT
Boats Knights of Seas is based on the Direct-3D-10 API, supports multicore CPUs
and comes with a physics engine. Also at this point we see a good scaling of the
CPU at low resolutions and nearly no influence when applying high resolutions.
1024 x 768, low details
PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10
(1024 x 768 low details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
99.5 fps |
132.84 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
91.6 fps |
123.45 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
88.4 fps |
118.02 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
84.5 fps |
112.82 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
82.0 fps |
109.48 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
75.1 fps |
100.27 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
74.9 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
74.8 fps |
99.87 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
74.2 fps |
99.07 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
68.5 fps |
91.15 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
67.0 fps |
89.45 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA
PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10
(1920 x 1080 high details, 8x AA) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
34.9 fps |
104.18 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
34.1 fps |
101.79 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
33.9 fps |
101.19 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
33.7 fps |
100.60 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
33.7 fps |
100.60 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
33.6 fps |
100.30 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
33.6 fps |
100.30 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
33.5 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
33.5 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
30.9 fps |
92.23 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
30.7 fps |
91.64 % |
|
more is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Resident Evil 5 DirectX10
Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR,
Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder
auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5
has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11
ready. By using the DirectX9 as well as the DirectX10 benchmark we can again
show you CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU
overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.
Resident Evil DirectX10
800 x 600, low details
Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600
low details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
195.0 fps |
135.56 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
170.0 fps |
116.44 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
163.0 fps |
111.64 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
160.2 fps |
109.73 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
160.2 fps |
109.73 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
154.9 fps |
106.10 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
146.0 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
126.7 fps |
86.78 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
126.1 fps |
86.67 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
110.7 fps |
75.82 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
110.6 fps |
75.75 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA
Resident Evil DirectX10 (1920 x
1080 high details, 8x AA) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
74.8 fps |
101.36 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.3 fps |
100.68 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
74.3 fps |
100.68 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.2 fps |
100.54 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.1 fps |
100.41 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
74.0 fps |
100.27 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
73.8 fps |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
72.9 fps |
98.78 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
72.1 fps |
81.16 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
60.1 fps |
81.44 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
59.2 fps |
80.22 % |
|
more is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Street Fighter4
Street Fighter 4 comes
with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play.
At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see
CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more
important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.
800 x 600, low details
Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low
details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
486.46 fps |
128.38 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
460.91 fps |
121.64 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
444.66 fps |
117.35 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
441.01 fps |
116.39 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
432.45 fps |
114.13 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
425.52 fps |
112.30 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
397.63 fps |
104.94 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
385.73 fps |
101.80 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
378.91 fps |
100.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
345.83 fps |
91.27 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
230.69 fps |
60.88 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA, 16x AF
Street Fighter 4 (1920 x 1080 high
details, 8x AA, 16x AF) |
|
Percent |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
98.06 fps |
122.51 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
87.18 fps |
108.92 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
87.10 fps |
108.82 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
85.58 fps |
106.92 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
82.51 fps |
103.08 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
80.46 fps |
100.52 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
80.27 fps |
100.29 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
80.17 fps |
100.16 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
80.12 fps |
100.10 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
80.04 fps |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
61.23 fps |
76.50 % |
|
more is better |
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Leistungsaufnahme
Hereby we take the
power consumption under load as well as idle. To generate a load situation we
use SiSoft Sandra's Burn-In Module and measure the whole systems power
consumption. The values we take when the System just booted into Windows and the
load drops.
Idle |
Performance |
Percent |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
81 Watt |
62.31 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
85 Watt |
65.38 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
86 Watt |
66.15 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
91 Watt |
70.00 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
106 Watt |
81.54 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
126 Watt |
96.92 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
130 Watt |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
132 Watt |
101.53 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
134 Watt |
103.08 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
136 Watt |
104.62 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
140 Watt |
107.69 % |
Load |
Performance |
Percent |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 |
150 Watt |
74.63 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 |
155 Watt |
77.11 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333 |
179 Watt |
89.05 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
196 Watt |
97.51 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 |
198 Watt |
98.51 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
201 Watt |
100.00 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 |
206 Watt |
102.49 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 |
211 Watt |
104.98 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 |
216 Watt |
107.46 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 |
220 Watt |
109.45 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 |
248 Watt |
123.38 % |
Overclocking
Using a very powerful Noctua NH-D14 aircooler we were able to reach 4.214 GHz at 1.44 Volt with the sample Intel provided us with. At this clock speed it's been still possible to run Futuremark Vantage stable. Therefore this is not a "suicidal-CPU-z"-Screenshot which would've provided you with the highest clockspeed possible before the system goes down with a bluescreen.
If we take a closer look at the 3DMark Vantage results we see that 13'787 point is 531 points more or in other words 4 percent. Comparing the CPU score values shows that 24'488 point is 4'567 point more than with the standard clock speed. This is equal to an increase of 22.9 percent.
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]
Conclusion
With the Core i7 875K Intel makes the LGA 1156 platform even more interesting for overclockers and PC-Enthusiasts. Combined with a Triple-Channel memory-kit this CPU performs very well. The strength definitely are single-threaded applicaitons which is logical because of the Turbo-mode that boots this thing all the way up to 3'600 MHz. Therefore also working with a system based on a Core i7 875K is a pleasure. Furthermore this CPU is very energy efficient when in idle. Under load things are a bit different. In this case it burns almost as much energy as an X58 platform carrying a Core i7 920.
Thanks to the open multiplyer overclocking this CPU really is fun. Under these circumstances it really is possible to get a maximum of performance out of your system because you can now adjust CPU frequencies perfectly to BCLK and memory clock. The Core i7 CPUs out of the 800-series are also know for being exceptionally good to do memory overclocking.
Using a Noctua NH-D14 CPU cooler we were able to squeeze a bit more than 4'200 MHz out of our samples. This was also about what we expected the CPU would be capable of. At this point we have to add that the overclocking results can vary easily by 200 MHz when you do different trys with another CPU from the exact same series.
Another good fact about all the LGA 1156 CPUs is that a platform based on them is about a third cheaper in price than the LGA 1366 but still performs very well. This is because the motherboards cost less and you'll be able to buy dual-channel memory and you're not bound to more expensive triple-channel kits.
If you're looking for a LGA 1156 compatible CPU which you use mainly for gaming and overclocking then you'll be very well off buying a Core i7 875K CPU. But be aware the K-series really only makes sense if you do overclock your system otherwise there is really no difference at all if you buy a Core i7 870.
Intels Core i7 875 K CPU can be bought at Digitec to a price of CHF 389.- (est. EUR 278.-).
Author: Marc Büchel,
m.buechel@ocaholic.ch
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren.