Intel Core i5 750 und Core i7 870 Performance Roundup
Category : Reviews
Published by Marc Büchel on 08.09.09
Original ImageOne year after the launch of the Bloomfield based i7 processors Intel now officially presents the Lynnfield product line. Hereby they show off three new mainstream CPUs: The i7 870, the i7 860 and the i5 750. The all are entirely based on the Nehalem microarchitecture whereas a the memory controller is limited to dual-channel operation. But the most important new feature should definitely be the enhanced Turbo-Mode which is now able to increase clock speeds automatically by up to 666 MHz.





How Intels recent Nehalem Core i7 CPUs perform in our benchmarking parcours, that's what we're going to show you on the following pages.



Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion


Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Specifications

  i5 750 i7 870 i7 975 XE i7 965 XE i7 920
Codename Lynnfield Lynnfield Nehalem Nehalem Nehalem
Socket LGA 1156 LGA 1156 LGA 1366 LGA 1366 LGA 1366
Manufacturing 45 nm 45 nm 45 nm 45 nm 45 nm
Transistors 774 Mio 774 Mio 731 Mio 731 Mio 731 Mio
Die-size 296 mm2 296 mm2 263 mm2 263 mm2 263 mm2
Clock 2.66 GHz 2.93 GHz 3.33 GHz 3.20 GHz 2.66 GHz
Cores 4C / 4T 4C / 8T 4C / 8T 4C / 8T 4C / 8T
Turbo Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Bus Speed 133 MHz 133 MHz 133 MHz 133 MHz 133 MHz
Memory DDR3 DDR3 DDR3 DDR3 DDR3
Memory controller Dual Channel Dual Channel Triple Channel Triple Channel Triple Channel
QPI 4.26 GT/s 4.26 GT/s 6.4 GT/s 6.4 GT/s 4.8 GT/s
L1 Execution Cache 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte
L1 Data Cache 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte 32 KByte
L2 Cache 256 KByte 256 KByte 256 KByte 256 KByte 256 KByte
L3 Cache 8 MB shared 8 MB shared 8 MB shared 8 MB shared 8 MB shared
TDP 95 Watt 95 Watt 130 Watt 130 Watt 130 Watt
C1E technology Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Enhanced Intel Speed Step Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Virtualisation Vanderpool Vanderpool Vanderpool Vanderpool Vanderpool
Instruction sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
SSE4.2, EM64T


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Die Lynnfield CPU


With Lynnfield Intel presents Bloomfields smaller brother which should show it's muscles especially in the mainstream market. In direct comparison to Bloomfield, Lynnfield is equipped with a dual-channel instead of a triple-channel memory interface. The i5 models have no hyperthreading but every single Lynnfield CPU comes with an enhanced Turbo-Mode. Intels arguments for a Turbo-Mode which is able to dynamically overclock the CPU by up to 666 MHz or in other word five multiplyer stpes is, that most of the software on the market is still not optimized for multithreaded CPUs and therefore the user mainly profits from higher clock speeds than massive parallelism.





Already with the Bloomfield Intel has been very proud of the scalability of Nehalems architecture, respectively the relative easyness to adapt the architecture to different markets. As a consequence it isn't a surprise that there weren't many changes on the "Die" itself. The only conspicuity is the fact that the Lynnfield CPUs carry about 40 million more transistors than their Bloomfield equivalents.



Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Test setup

Mainboard
  • Intel DP55KG
CPUs
  • Intel Core i7 975 XE, 3.33 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 965 XE, 3.20 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 950, 3.06 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 940, 2.93 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 920, 2.66 GHz
  • Intel Core i7 870, 2.93 GHz
  • Intel Core i5 750, 2.66 GHz
Speicher
  • Corsair Dominator TR3X3G1600C8D, 2 x 2 GByte
Grafikkarten
  • Gigabyte GTX 285
Festplatte
  • Samsung Spinpoint F1 640 GByte
Netzteil
  • Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050 Watt


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

3DMark 06

3DMark 06 is getting older these days. Therefore if you are using really powerful graphic cards you will hit CPU limitation which means that the graphic card isn't the bottleneck in the system. This is also the reason why in recent high-end desktop systems 3DMark 06 scales nicely with the CPU and the graphic card has much less influence on the scores.

Total

3DMark 06 Total   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 18'368 120.23 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 17'617 115.31 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 17'463 114.30 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 17'330 113.43 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 16'218 106.15 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 15'688 102.68 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 15'278 100.00 %
  more is better


CPU

3DMark 06 CPU   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 6'007 127.40 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 5'539 117.48 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 5'329 113.02 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 5'166 109.57 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 5'118 108.54 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 4'715 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 4'242 89.97 %
  more is better


3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems struggle.

Total

3DMark Vantage Total   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 13'506 104.33 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 13'391 103.45 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 13'250 102.36 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 13'183 101.84 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 12'949 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 12'945 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 12'035 92.97 %
  more is better


CPU

3DMark Vantage CPU   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 21'472 126.38 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 20'078 118.18 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 19'285 113.51 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 18'444 108.56 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 18'605 109.51 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 16'990 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 12'791 75.29 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Cinebench

The test procedure consists of two main components: The first test sequence is dedicated to the computer's main processor. A 3D scene file is used to render a photoreaslistic image. The scene makes use of various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders. During the first run the benchmark only uses one CPU (or CPU core) to ascertain a reference value. On computers that have multiple CPUs or CPU cores and on those that simulate multiple CPUs (via HyperThreading or similar technolgies), Cinebench will run a second test using all available CPU power.

1 CPU

Cinebench R10 1 CPU   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 174 sec 78.03 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 187 sec 83.86 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 195 sec 87.44 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 198 sec 88.79 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 203 sec 91.03 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 207 sec 92.83 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 223 sec 100.00 %
  less is better


X CPU

Cinebench R10 X CPU   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 43 sec 78.18 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 48 sec 87.27 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 50 sec 90.10 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 52 sec 94.54 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 52 sec 94.54 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 55 sec 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 63 sec 114.55 %
  less is better


POV-Ray 3.7

Pov-Ray is a raytracer which comes with an integrated benchmark routine that allows CPU single- and multicore performacne. Therefore a predefined 3D-Scene is being rendered twice by the CPU and as a result you get a PPS (Pixel per Secon) value.

Singlethread

POV-Ray Singlethread   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 865.92 PPS 128.56 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 807.34 PPS 119.86 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 792.85 PPS 117.71 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 776.52 PPS 115.29 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 748.13 PPS 110.08 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 734.09 PPS 108.99 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 673.56 PPS 100.00 %
  more is better


Multithread

POV-Ray Multithreaded   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 4'342.65 PPS 130.27 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 4'003.79 PPS 120.11 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 3840.94 PPS 115.22 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 3685.11 PPS 100.55 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 3'605.33 PPS 108.54 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 3'333.51 PPS 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 2'672.07 PPS 80.16 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

SiSoft Sandra 1

SiSoft Sandra is a theoretical multi purpose benchmark suite which is able to show differences in CPU architectures. We split the tests with SiSoft Sandra into two parts. Therefore on this page you'll find Arithmetic-, Multimedia- and Cryptography-benchmarks.

Arithmetik

SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetik - Drystone   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 82.58 GIPS 129.92 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 76.30 GIPS 120.04 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 73.16 GIPS 115.10 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 71.68 GIPS 112.78 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 69.91 GIPS 109.99 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 68.53 GIPS 107.81 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 63.56 GIPS 100.00 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetik - Whetstone   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 71.95 GFLOPS 129.15 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 66.70 GFLOPS 119.72 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 64.17 GFLOPS 116.31 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 61.40 GFLOPS 110.21 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 59.28 GFLOPS 106.41 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 55.71 GFLOPS 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 31.97 GFLOPS 60.98 %
  more is better


Multimedia

SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Integer   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 175.93 MPixel/s 130.40 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 162.22 MPixel/s 120.24 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 155.65 MPixel/s 115.37 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 150.19 MPixel/s 111.32 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 148.78 MPixel/s 110.28 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 134.91 MPixel/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 116.72 MPixel/s 86.52 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Fliesskomma   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 135.49 MPixel/s 129.97 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 125.10 MPixel/s 120.00 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 119.90 MPixel/s 115.01 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 114.74 MPixel/s 110.06 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 114.44 MPixel/s 109.78 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 104.25 MPixel/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 90.02 MPixel/s 86.35 %
  more is better


Crytography

SiSoft Sandra - Kryptographie - AES 256   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 625 MB/s 129.67 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 579 MB/s 120.12 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 554 MB/s 114.94 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 530 MB/s 109.96 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 528 MB/s 109.54 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 482 MB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 456 MB/s 94.61 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Kryptographie - SHA 256   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 581 MB/s 129.98 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 536 MB/s 119.91 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 522 MB/s 116.78 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 514 MB/s 114.99 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 513 MB/s 114.77 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 492 MB/s 110.07 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 447 MB/s 100.00 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

SiSoft Sandra 2

At this point we deliver the values regarding Memory Bandwidth, Memory Latency as well as Memory and Cache Access.

Memory bandwidth

SiSoft Sandra - Speicherbandbreite - Integer   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.60 GB/s 101.33 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 26.54 GB/s 101.10 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 26.48 GB/s 100.88 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 26.40 GB/s 100.57 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.25 GB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 14.95 GB/s 56.95 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 14.51 GB/s 55.28 %
  more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Speicherbandbreite - Fliesskomma   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.56 GB/s 101.26 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 26.58 GB/s 101.33 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 26.49 GB/s 100.99 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 26.40 GB/s 100.65 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 26.23 GB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 15.10 GB/s 57.57 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 14.62 GB/s 55.74 %
  more is better


Memory latency

SiSoft Sandra - Speicherlatenz   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 63 ns 95.45 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 63 ns 95.45 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 64 ns 96.97 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 65 ns 98.48 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 66 ns 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 80 ns 121.21 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 82 ns 124.24 %
  less is better


Memory and cache access

SiSoft Sandra - Speicher und Cache Zugriff   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 78.06 GB/s 115.80 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 74.66 GB/s 110.76 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 72.89 GB/s 108.13 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 71.05 GB/s 105.40 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 67.41 GB/s 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 57.69 GB/s 85.58 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 53.94 GB/s 80.02 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Super Pi

Meanwhile Super Pi even in its latest version has become pretty old. Never the less it is able to show scaling to the clock speed nicely.

1M

Super Pi 1.5 XS - 1M   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 11.700 sec 77.40 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 12.636 sec 83.59 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 13.177 sec 87.17 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 13.260 sec 87.71 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 13.760 sec 91.02 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 13.975 sec 92.45 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 15.117 sec 100.00 %
  less is better


32M

Super Pi 1.5 XS - 32M   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 631.426 sec 78.95 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 678.429 sec 84.83 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 683.795 sec 85.50 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 701.328 sec 87.69 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 707.463 sec 88.08 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 734.089 sec 91.79 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 799.781 sec 100.00 %
  less is better


wPrime

wPrime is based on a multithreaded algorithm to calculate the square root to up to 32 billion digits. Therefore it is possible to put 100 percent load on every core or thread and to see differences between architectures.

32M

wPrime - 32M   Percent
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 35.406 sec 76.75 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 36.786 sec 79.74 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 38.297 sec 83.02 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 39.243 sec 85.07 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 39.965 sec 86.64 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 41.901 sec 90.85 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 46.130 sec 100.00 %
  less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

WinRAR

WinRAR is a well known archivier. It is highly efficient and it also comes with an integrated benchmark routine. We also do a real world application be archiving a folder which exists on the hard drive.

Integer Test

WinRAR - Interger Test   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 3'929 KB/sec 111.65 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 3'849 KB/sec 109.38 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 3'738 KB/sec 106.22 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 3'694 KB/sec 104.97 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 3'519 KB/sec 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 3'251 KB/sec 92.38 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 2'395 KB/sec 68.06 %
  more is better


Folder compression

WinRAR - Ordner Kompression (669 Dateien / 32 Ordner / 694 MB)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 130 sec 88.43 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 135 sec 91.83 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 138 sec 93.88 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 141 sec 95.91 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 147 sec 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 174 sec 118.37 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 215 sec 146.63 %
  less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]


Crysis DirectX10

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 as well as DirectX10 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX10

800 x 600, low details

Crysis DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 146.41 fps 116.66 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 139.91 fps 111.48 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 135.65 fps 108.09 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 132.60 fps 105.66 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 125.50 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 109.52 fps 87.67 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 107.91 fps 85.98 %
  more is better


1920 x 1080, very high details, 16x AA

Crysis DirectX10 (1920 x 1080 high details, 16x AA)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 19.79 fps 100.79 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 19.74 fps 100.58 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 19.72 fps 100.48 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 19.69 fps 100.26 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 19.63 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 19.35 fps 98.57 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 19.32 fps 98.42 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10

PT Boats Knights of Seas is based on the Direct-3D-10 API, supports multicore CPUs and comes with a physics engine. Also at this point we see a good scaling of the CPU at low resolutions and nearly no influence when applying high resolutions.

1024 x 768, low details

PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10 (1024 x 768 low details)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 91.6 fps 123.45 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 88.4 fps 118.02 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 84.5 fps 112.82 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 82.0 fps 109.48 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 74.9 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 74.8 fps 99.87 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 74.2 fps 99.07 %
  more is better


1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA

PT Boats Knights of Seas DirectX10 (1920 x 1080 high details, 8x AA)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 33.7 fps 100.60 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 33.7 fps 100.60 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 33.6 fps 100.30 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 33.5 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 33.5 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 30.9 fps 92.23 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 30.7 fps 91.64 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Resident Evil 5 DirectX10

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 as well as the DirectX10 benchmark we can again show you CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX10

800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 170.0 fps 116.44 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 163.0 fps 111.64 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 160.2 fps 109.73 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 154.9 fps 106.10 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 146.0 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 126.7 fps 86.78 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 126.1 fps 86.67 %
  more is better


1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA

Resident Evil DirectX10 (1920 x 1080 high details, 8x AA)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 74.3 fps 100.68 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 74.2 fps 100.54 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 74.1 fps 100.41 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 74.0 fps 100.27 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 73.8 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 59.9 fps 81.16 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 59.2 fps 80.22 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Street Fighter4

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 460.91 fps 121.64 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 441.01 fps 116.39 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 425.52 fps 112.30 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 397.63 fps 104.94 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 391.45 fps 103.31 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 385.73 fps 101.80 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 378.91 fps 100.00 %
  more is better


1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA, 16x AF

Street Fighter 4 (1920 x 1080 high details, 8x AA, 16x AF)   Percent
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 80.46 fps 100.52 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 80.27 fps 100.29 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 80.17 fps 100.16 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 80.12 fps 100.10 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 80.04 fps 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 61.58 fps 76.94 %
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 61.23 fps 76.50 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Leistungsaufnahme

Hereby we take the power consumption under load as well as idle. To generate a load situation we use SiSoft Sandra's Burn-In Module and measure the whole systems power consumption. The values we take when the System just booted into Windows and the load drops.

Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 81 Watt 62.31 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 86 Watt 66.15 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 130 Watt 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 132 Watt 101.53 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 134 Watt 103.08 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 136 Watt 104.62 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 140 Watt 107.69 %


Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333 150 Watt 74.63 %
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333 155 Watt 77.11 %
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600 201 Watt 100.00 %
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600 206 Watt 102.49 %
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600 211 Watt 104.98 %
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600 216 Watt 107.46 %
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600 220 Watt 109.45 %


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren. [pagebreak]

Conclusion

With the new Lynnfield CPU Intel presents a very interesting new product line. Only the Core i7 870 CPU comes with a rather high price tag. For example with an i7 860 CPU it is possible to configure a system where the base components as CPU, mainboard and memory only cost about CHF 600.- (est. EUR 400.-). Therfore Intel is now also in the mainstream sector at least one step ahead from the competitor AMD. They now have a product line in their portfolio which is able to convince regarding price and performance.

Because of the reason that Lynnfield is a down scaled version of Bloomfiield it can still profit from most of the advantages the Nehalem architecture comes with. The i7 Models therefore are equipped with SMT as well as an overworked Turbo-Mode which now is able to raise the clock speeds up to 666 MHz or in other words by five multiplyer steps. Like this the enduser gets a real performance benefit in single threaded applications when the clock speed is as high as possible.

If we look at the performance figures the i7 870 is able to compete easily with a i7 920 CPU thank to the enhanced Turbo-Mode. Single threaded application profit quite massively from the enhanced Turbo-Mode. Therefore it isn't a surprise that especially in Super Pi and Pov Ray the i7 870 CPU comes dangerously close to a i7 965 CPU. Not only the theoretical benchmarks profit because of the better Turbo-Mode also the multithreaded applications get a nice performance benefit from the up to 666 MHz faster clock speeds.
One small weakness of the Lynnfield CPU seem to be recent games at high resolutions and high detail level. Therefore we were able to see performance drops in Streetfighter 4 and Resident Evil by up to 24 percent.

The best thing about the new Lynnfield CPUs is the massively lower power consumption compared to the Bloomfield models. If a system with an i5 750 CPU is in idle it draws 35 percent less wattage than an setup which is basend on a i7 920 CPU. Even under load the savings are about 25 percent.

If you're looking for a CPU which has a very wide area of application field and comes with a sensible price tag Lynnfield should be just perfect. Therefore it doesnt matter if you'd like to assemble an up-to-date gaming system or a file server.

At Digitec you can buy the Core i5 750, the Core i7 860 and i7 870 to the following prices:



Author: Marc Büchel, m.buechel@ocaholic.ch

Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Super Pi / Wprime
Page 2 - Specifications Page 10 - Compression
Page 3 - The Lynnfield CPU Page 11 - Crysis
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 12 - PT Boats Knights of Seas
Page 5 - Futuremark Page 13 - Resident Evil 5
Page 6 - Cinebench Page 14 - Street Fighter 4
Page 7 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 15 - Power consumption
Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 2 Page 16 - Conclusion



Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren.