ASRock X99 Extreme6 Review
Category : X99
Published by Hiwa Pouri on 17.02.15
With the X99 Extreme6, ASRock has yet another X99 motherboard in their portfolio. This particular model comes with a reasonable feature mix and also the price is well chosen, so it's an affordable high-end product. For us this is reason enough to have a close look at this motherboard and to find out what it can do.



  Article in English   Artikel in Deutsch  Article en français  Articolo in italiano




After doing several reviews on the latest High-end intel chipset  X99 we had chance to test ASRock's X99 Extreme6 motherboard. Overall this board features the same color scheme as the X99-WS we've already had for review and it comes with a rather reasonable feature, which leaves us curious to find out what this board can do.

Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Specs and Delivery

Chipset Intel X99
Memory Quad Channel DDR4, 8 x DIMM, Max. 64 GB DDR3, 2933+(OC) / 2800(OC) / 2400(OC) / 2133 MHz Non-ECC, Un-buffered Memory
Multi-GPU
  • Supports NVIDIA 4-way SLI Technology
  • Supports AMD 4-way CrossFireX Technology
Slots
  • 40 Lane CPU
    • 3 x PCIe 3.0 x16 (x16, dual x16, x16/x16/x8)
  • 28 Lane CPU
    • 3 x PCI Express 3.0/2.0 x16 slots (x16, x16/x4)
  • 1 x M.2 x4 slot
  • 2 x PCIe 2.0 x1
  • 1x Mini PCIe
Sound Realtek ALC1150 8-Channel High Definition Audio CODEC
  • Supports : Jack-detection, Multi-streaming, Front Panel Jack-retasking
  • Blu-ray audio layer Content Protection
  • Optical S/PDIF out port(s) at back panel
 
Storage
  • 10 x SATA 6Gb/s port(s), red
  • Support Raid 0, 1, 5, 10
  • Intel Rapid Storage Technology support
  • Supports Intel Dynamic Storage Accelerator, Intel Smart Response Technology, Intel Rapid Start Technology, Intel Smart Connect Technology
Network
  • Intel I218V Gigabit LAN
  • Qualcomm Atheros AR8171 Gigabit LAN
  • Supports Wake-On-LAN
  • Supports Dual LAN Teaming
  • Supports Energy Efficient Ethernet 802.3az
  • Supports PXE
Internal Connectors
  • 1 x COM Port Headers
  • 1 x TPM Header
  • 1 x Power LED Header
  • 2 x CPU Fan Connectors (1 x 4-pin, 1 x 3-pin)
  • 3 x Chassis Fan Connectors (1 x 4-pin, 2 x 3-pin)
  • 1 x Power Fan Connector (3-pin)
  • 1 x 24 pin ATX Power Connector
  • 1 x 8 pin 12V Power Connector
  • 1 x HDD Saver Connector
  • 2 x PCIe Power Connectors
  • 1 x Front Panel Audio Connector
  • 1 x Thunderbolt AIC Connecotr
  • 2 x USB 2.0 Headers
  • 1x Vertical Type A USB 2.0
  • 2 x USB 3.0 Header
  • 1 x Dr. Debug with LED
  • 1 x Power Switch with LED
  • 1 x Reset Switch with LED
  • 1 x BIOS Selection Switch
Extrenal Connectors
  • 1 x PS/2 Mous/Keayboard Port
  • 1 x Optical SPDIF Out Port
  • 1 x eSATA Connector
  • 2 x USB 2.0 Ports
  • 6 x USB 3.0 Ports
  • 2 x RJ-45 LAND Ports
  • 1 x Clear CMOS
  • HD Audio Jacks: Rear Speaker / Central / Bass / Line in / Front Speaker / Microphone
Forfactor ATX (30.5 cm x 24.4 cm)


   





Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Features

12 + 4 Phase Power Design

Since quite some time ASRock has been equipping its boards with digital power designs. With the X99 Extreme6 they are very proud about their quite complex solution which consists of Ultra Dual-N MOSFET's (UDM), NextFET MOSFETs and 12K Platinum caps.

 

Purity Sound 2

The ASRock Purity 2 audio solution is based on a Realtek ALC1150 audio codec and features 115dB SNR. It also comes with EMI shielding for the main chip as well as onboard isolation. In order to improve signal quality, the motherboard features excellent Nichicon onboard capacitors.
 

M.2 Support

The new X99 Extreme6 motherboard from ASRock features an M.2 slot which is placed between two PCIe slots. This motherboard can be equipped with SSDs in M.2 format and it is wired directly to the X99 PCH via four PCI Express lanes, therefore offering up to 20 Gbps can be pushed over the bus through this slot.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Layout


At a first glance the ASRock X99 Extreme6 leaves a very good impression with its good looking design. The manufacturer decided to go for a combination of black and blue, which suites nicely and in the end you get an aesthetic looking product. The layout itself is well thought and there is for example plenty of space around the CPU socket to install even todays largest CPU coolers. The fact that there are SATA connectors which have been angled by 90 degrees allows for an easy installation of oversized graphics cards. Meanwhile ASRock is using very similarly shaped cooling blocks on all motherboards in order to unify the design language. The only thing that is changed in the end is the color.



The ASRock X99 Extreme6 comes with a digital 12+4 phase power design, whereas the CPU is backed up by twelve phases and the memory by four. Like we've already explained on the features page ASRock is making use of an extensive solution. There are Ultra Dual-N MOSFETs, NexFET MOSFETs as well as Nichicon 12K Platinum caps on this motherboard. The Ultra Dual-N MOSFETs are taking care of stable and efficient current delivery to the CPU and compared to standard MOSFETs they offer a significantly lower RDS(on) value of just 1.2 milliohm. The memory gets backed-up by NexFET MOSFETs, which also offer a very low ROD(on) value of 2.9 milliohm. Last but definitely not least there 12K Platinum Caps, which offer no less than 12'000 hours operating time.

Totally you'll find eight DIMM-slots on the ASRock X99 Extreme6. Officially supported are DDR4, 2933+(OC) / 2800(OC) / 2400(OC) / 2133 MHz. There is engough space between the DIMM-slots and the CPU socket which means that you wont encounter compatibility problems with big coolers even when you choose to install RAM with big heatspreaders. Also supported are Xtreme Memory Profiles (XMP) in version 2.0.

On the X99 Extreme6 PCH as well as current converters receive separate cooling. Checking on the two VRM coolers we see there is a heatpipe connecting them and therefore making heat dissipation more efficient. Other than that the weight of this board is quite high, which is also partially due to cooling blocks. Subjectively speaking a high weight is a first indicator for a quality motherboard.

  


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Connectors and I/O


Totally ASRock equipped the X99 Extreme6 with ten angled SATA ports. All ports offer 6Gbps bandwidth and they've been wired directly to the X99 PCH. There is also a M.2 x4 expansion slot, which has been connected through four PCI Express 2.0 lanes. If you decide to use the M.2 slot you should keep in mind, that the third full-size PCI Express slot will be deactivated. Overall there is good storage flexibility with this motherboard is excellent and therefore workstations as well as enthusiast builds can be equipped with plenty of drives. The layout in general is very similar to ASRocks, even more high-end, X99 WS motherboard, which we've already had for review. What we always like to find are practical onboard power- and reset-buttons as well as a debug LED and in the case of this board they are located in the top right corner of the PCB.
 

Totally you'll find six fan headers on the ASRock X99 Extreme6 which is more than enough, to provide a well equipped high-end system or also a workstation with fresh air. The fan headers are located around the CPU socket as well as spread over the motherboard. Unfortunately not all headers offer 4 pins which means that you can't regulate fan speeds in BIOS or Windows for alle fans attached to the board.

  

Looking at the external connectors directly at the back-panel ASRock equipped the X99 Extreme6 with one PS2 mouse/keyboard connector, six USB 3.0/2.0 ports, two USB 2.0/1.1 ports, two gigabit ethernet ports, an eSATA connector as well as an optical out and an analogue audio panel. Furtheremore you'll also find a clear CMOS-reset button.



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

BIOS


With the most recent version of ASRock's UEFI BIOS, we find a visually more attractive than what you got with the predecessor, but still we would like it to be less flashy. In terms of functionality you can not only monitor system information, CPU and motherboard temperature, CPU voltage and DRAM status but you can also create your own fan profiles for the different PWM headers.

   


   


   


   


   


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Test setup

Hardware

Motherboard
  • ASRock X99 Extreme6
  • ASRock X99 OC Formula
  • ASRock X99 WS
  • ASUS Rampage V Extreme
  • ASUS X99-A
  • ASUS X99 Deluxe
  • EVGA X99 Classified
  • Gigabyte X99-UD4
  • Gigabyte X99-SOC Force
  • MSI X99S MPower
Processor Intel Core i7-5960X, 3.5 GHz
Memory 16 GB (4x4) G.Skill Ripjaws4 DDR4-3000 MHz CL15-15-15-35-Auto @ DDR4-2133 CL14-14-14-35-2T
Graphic card ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti Matrix Platinum
Driver ForceWare 340.52
Hard disk OCZ Arc 100 SSD 240 GB
Power supply Seasonic Platinum 1050W


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Preview / Gallery

Product Picture Link to Gallery
   

ASRock X99 Extreme6

   

ASRock X99 OC Formula

   

ASRock X99 WS

   

ASUS Rampage V Extreme

   

ASUS X99 Deluxe

   

ASUS X99-A

   
 

EVGA X99 Classified

   

Gigabyte X99-UD4

   

Gigabyte X99-SOC Force

   

MSI X99S MPower

   


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

3DMark

Ice Storm

3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Score
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 160'789 102.18 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 159'987 101.67 %
ASRock X99 WS 159'888 101.60 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 159'688 101.48 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 159'514 101.37 %
ASUS X99-A 159'157 101.14 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 158'658 100.82 %
MSI X99S MPower 158'442 100.68 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 158'099 100.47 %
EVGA X99 Classified 157'365 100.00 %
more is better


Ice Storm Physics

3DMark Ice Storm Physics Score
Review Rating
Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 59'720 102.28 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 59'653 102.16 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 59'650 102.16 %
ASUS X99-A 59'636 102.14 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 59'635 102.13 %
ASRock X99 WS 59'580 102.04 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 59'548 101.98 %
MSI X99S MPower 59'512 101.92 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 59'428 101.78 %
EVGA X99 Classified 58'389 100.00 %
more is better


Fire Strike Extreme

3DMark Fire Strike Score
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 5'533 100.56 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 5'532 100.55 %
MSI X99S MPower 5'531 100.53 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 5'530 100.51 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 5'528 100.47 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 5'528 100.47 %
ASRock X99 WS 5'526 100.44 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 5'516 100.25 %
EVGA X99 Classified 5'502 100.00 %
ASUS X99-A 5'498 99.93 %
more is better


Fire Strike Physics

3DMark Fire Strike Physics Score
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 17'227 104.49 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 17'217 104.43 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 17'168 104.13 %
MSI X99S MPower 17'166 104.12 %
ASRock X99 WS 17'160 104.08 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 17'156 104.06 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 17'142 103.97 %
ASUS X99-A 17'133 103.92 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 17'100 100.72 %
EVGA X99 Classified 16'487 100.00 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Total
Review Rating
Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 15'988 103.87 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 15'947 103.61 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 15'922 103.44 %
ASUS X99-A 15'898 103.29 %
ASRock X99 WS 15'777 102.50 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 15'756 102.36 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 15'741 102.27 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 15'652 101.69 %
MSI X99S MPower 15'455 100.41 %
EVGA X99 Classified 15'392 100.00 %
more is better


CPU

3DMark 11 Physics
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 16'329 107.07 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 16'279 106.74 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 16'132 105.78 %
ASUS X99-A 16'070 105.37 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 15'445 101.27 %
ASRock X99 WS 15'397 100.96 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 15'293 100.28 %
MSI X99S MPower 15'280 100.19 %
EVGA X99 Classified 15'251 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 15'212 99.74 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage Total
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 50'220 102.51 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 50'187 102.45 %
ASUS X99-A 50'081 102.23 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 50'050 102.17 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 49'843 101.75 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 49'836 101.73 %
ASRock X99 WS 49'828 101.71 %
MSI X99S MPower 49'800 101.66 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 49'756 101.57 %
EVGA X99 Classified 48'988 100.00 %
more is better


3DMark Vantage CPU
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 51'564 102.61 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 51'363 102.21 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 51'299 102.09 %
ASRock X99 WS 51'257 102.00 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 51'167 101.82 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 51'163 101.82 %
MSI X99S MPower 51'102 101.70 %
ASUS X99-A 51'073 101.64 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 50'899 101.29 %
EVGA X99 Classified 50'250 100.00 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

PC Mark 08

Total

PC Mark 08 Total
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 4'437 103.98 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 4'404 103.21 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 4'402 103.16 %
ASRock X99 WS 4'399 103.09 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 4'398 103.07 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 4'398 103.07 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 4'390 102.88 %
MSI X99S MPower 4'389 102.86 %
ASUS X99-A 4'388 102.84 %
EVGA X99 Classified 4'267 100.00 %
more is better


Web browsing - JunglePin
Review Rating
s Percent
EVGA X99 Classified 0.262 100.00 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 0.288 90.97 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 0.288 90.97 %
ASRock X99 WS 0.288 90.97 %
ASUS X99-A 0.288 90.97 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 0.288 90.97 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 0.288 90.97 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 0.288 90.97 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 0.288 90.97 %
MSI X99S MPower 0.288 90.97 %
less is better


Web Browsing Amazonia
Review Rating
s Percent
ASRock X99 Extreme6 0.122 100.00 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 0.122 100.00 %
ASRock X99 WS 0.122 100.00 %
ASUS X99-A 0.122 100.00 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 0.122 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 0.122 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified 0.122 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 0.122 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 0.122 100.00 %
MSI X99S MPower 0.122 100.00 %
less is better


Writing
Review Rating
s Percent
ASRock X99 WS 4.08 107.60 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 4.11 106.81 %
ASUS X99-A 4.12 106.55 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 4.22 104.03 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 4.33 101.39 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 4.33 101.39 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 4.33 101.39 %
MSI X99S MPower 4.35 100.46 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 4.35 100.46 %
EVGA X99 Classified 4.39 100.00 %
less is better


Photo Editing
Review Rating
s Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 0.283 127.67 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 0.283 127.67 %
ASRock X99 WS 0.283 127.67 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 0.282 127.66 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 0.286 125.87 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 0.286 125.87 %
ASUS X99-A 0.306 117.68 %
MSI X99S MPower 0.306 117.68 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 0.306 117.68 %
EVGA X99 Classified 0.360 100.00 %
less is better


Video Chat encoding / Video Chat Playback 1
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASRock X99 Extreme6 30.00 100.00 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 30.00 100.00 %
ASRock X99 WS 30.00 100.00 %
ASUS X99-A 30.00 100.00 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 30.00 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 30.00 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified 30.00 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 30.00 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 30.00 100.00 %
MSI X99S MPower 30.00 100.00 %
more is better


Video Chat encoding / Video Chat encoding
Review Rating
ms Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 42.00 102.62 %
ASRock X99 WS 42.00 102.62 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 42.00 102.62 %
ASUS X99-A 42.00 102.62 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 42.00 102.62 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 42.00 102.62 %
MSI X99S MPower 42.00 102.62 %
EVGA X99 Classified 43.00 100.23 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 43.00 100.23 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 43.10 99.76 %
  less is better


Casual Gaming
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 110.1 101.10 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 109.8 100.83 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 109.7 100.73 %
ASRock X99 WS 109.6 100.64 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 109.4 100.46 %
EVGA X99 Classified 108.9 100.00 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 108.7 99.82 %
MSI X99S MPower 108.5 99.63 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 108.4 99.54 %
ASUS X99-A 108.3 99.45 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Arithmetic Benchmark

SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic Benchmark - Dhrystone
Review Rating
GIPS Percent
ASRock X99 WS 241.37 100.37 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 241.24 100.31 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 240.90 100.17 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 240.83 100.14 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 240.80 100.13 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 240.70 100.09 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 240.69 100.08 %
MSI X99S MPower 240.68 100.08 %
EVGA X99 Classified 240.49 100.00 %
ASUS X99-A 238.68 99.25 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Arithmetic Benchmark - Whetstone
Review Rating
GFLOPS Percent
ASRock X99 WS 190.29 100.44 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 190.28 100.43 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 189.70 100.13 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 189.69 100.07 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 189.69 100.07 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 189.49 100.02 %
EVGA X99 Classified 189.46 100.00 %
MSI X99S MPower 189.22 99.87 %
ASUS X99-A 186.91 98.67 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 186.84 98.66 %
more is better


Multimedia

SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Integer
Review Rating
MPixels/sec Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 452.13 105.10 %
ASRock X99 WS 451.88 105.04 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 451.34 104.92 %
MSI X99S MPower 451.26 104.90 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 451.25 104.90 %
ASUS X99-A 446.55 103.81 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 446.47 103.79 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 443.38 103.07 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 442.67 102.90 %
EVGA X99 Classified 430.18 100.00 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Multimedia - Integer
Review Rating
MPixels/sec Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 452.13 105.10 %
ASRock X99 WS 451.88 105.04 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 451.34 104.92 %
MSI X99S MPower 451.26 104.90 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 451.25 104.90 %
ASUS X99-A 446.55 103.81 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 446.47 103.79 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 443.38 103.07 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 442.67 102.90 %
EVGA X99 Classified 430.18 100.00 %
more is better


Crytography

SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - AES 256
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 14.45 105.24 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 14.45 105.24 %
ASRock X99 WS 14.44 103.79 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 14.44 105.17 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 14.07 102.48 %
MSI X99S MPower 14.03 102.18 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 14.00 101.97 %
ASUS X99-A 13.92 101.38 %
EVGA X99 Classified 13.73 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 13.50 98.18 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Crytography - SHA 256
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 9.28 100.54 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 9.26 100.32 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 9.25 100.22 %
ASRock X99 WS 9.25 100.22 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 9.24 100.11 %
EVGA X99 Classified 9.23 100.00 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 9.20 99.67 %
MSI X99S MPower 9.19 99.57 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 9.18 99.45 %
ASUS X99-A 9.16 99.24 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

SiSoft Sandra 2

Memory bandwidth

SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - Integer
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 46.61 104.74 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 46.59 104.70 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 46.57 104.65 %
ASUS X99-A 46.55 104.61 %
ASRock X99 WS 46.52 104.54 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 46.48 104.45 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 45.87 103.08 %
MSI X99S MPower 44.52 100.04 %
EVGA X99 Classified 44.50 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 43.23 97.15 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - floating point
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 47.73 106.07 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 47.68 105.96 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 47.20 104.89 %
ASRock X99 WS 47.15 104.78 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 46.61 103.58 %
ASUS X99-A 45.92 102.04 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 45.69 101.53 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 45.57 101.27 %
MSI X99S MPower 45.55 101.22 %
EVGA X99 Classified 45.00 100.00 %
more is better


Memory latency

SiSoft Sandra - Memory latency
Review Rating
ns Percent
ASRock X99 WS 27.4 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified 27.4 100.00 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 27.6 99.28 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 27.6 99.28 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 27.7 98.92 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 27.9 98.21 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 27.8 98.56 %
MSI X99S MPower 28.8 96.00 %
ASUS X99-A 29.0 94.48 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 30.0 91.33 %
less is better more is better


Memory and cache access

SiSoft Sandra - Memory and cache access
Review Rating
GB/sec Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 351.69 104.81 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 351.65 104.79 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 351.58 104.77 %
ASRock X99 WS 348.54 103.87 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 347.68 103.61 %
MSI X99S MPower 347.50 103.56 %
ASUS X99-A 347.47 103.55 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 339.12 101.06 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 336.21 100.19 %
EVGA X99 Classified 335.56 100.00 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

UC Bench

UC Bench
Review Rating
PW/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 1801.8 102.41 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 1801.5 102.39 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 1801.3 102.38 %
MSI X99S MPower 1801.3 102.38 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 1801.2 102.38 %
ASRock X99 WS 1799.7 102.29 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 1799.5 102.28 %
ASUS X99-A 1799.0 102.27 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 1798.3 102.21 %
EVGA X99 Classified 1759.4 100.00 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Super Pi 1M - 32M

Super Pi 1M

SuperPi 1.5 XS - 1M
Review Rating
sec Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 10.233 103.04 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 10.250 102.87 %
ASRock X99 WS 10.389 101.49 %
ASUS X99-A 10.390 101.48 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 10.410 101.29 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 10.431 101.08 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 10.492 100.50 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 10.502 100.40 %
MSI X99S MPower 10.533 100.10 %
EVGA X99 Classified 10.544 100.00 %
less is better more is better

Super Pi 32M

SuperPi 1.5 XS - 32M
Review Rating
sec Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 541.659 100.67 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 541.812 100.65 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 542.437 100.53 %
ASRock X99 WS 542.553 100.51 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 542.588 100.50 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 543.927 100.25 %
ASUS X99-A 544.005 100.24 %
EVGA X99 Classified 545.313 100.00 %
MSI X99S MPower 552.218 98.75 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 553.569 98.51 %
less is better more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

wPrime 1024M Multicore

wPrime - 1024M Multi Core
Review Rating
sec Percent
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 103.896 102.56 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 103.999 102.46 %
MSI X99S MPower 104.022 102.43 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 104.049 102.41 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 104.047 102.41 %
ASUS X99-A 104.488 101.98 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 104.506 101.96 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 104.755 101.72 %
ASRock X99 WS 104.755 101.72 %
EVGA X99 Classified 106.554 100.00 %
less is better more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Cinebench R15

Cinebench R11.5 - Multi Core

Cinebench R15 - Multi Core
Review Rating
pts Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 1'402 105.33 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 1'398 105.03 %
ASRock X99 WS 1'396 104.88 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 1'396 104.88 %
ASUS X99-A 1'396 104.88 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 1'395 104.81 %
MSI X99S MPower 1'394 104.73 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 1'391 104.51 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 1'381 103.76 %
EVGA X99 Classified 1'331 100.00 %
less is better more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Tomb Raider

Low resolution, low details

Tomb Raider (low resolution, low details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 724.30 101.09 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 724.00 101.05 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 723.00 100.91 %
ASRock X99 WS 722.60 100.85 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 717.95 100.20 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 717.55 100.15 %
MSI X99S MPower 717.00 100.07 %
EVGA X99 Classified 716.50 100.00 %
ASUS X99-A 700.22 97.73 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 689.80 96.27 %
more is better


High resolution, high details

Tomb Raider (high resolution, high details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASRock X99 WS 52.3 100.38 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 52.3 100.38 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 52.2 100.19 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 52.2 100.19 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 52.2 100.19 %
MSI X99S MPower 52.2 100.19 %
EVGA X99 Classified 52.1 100.00 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 52.0 99.81 %
ASUS X99-A 52.0 99.81 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 52.0 99.81 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Metro Last Light

Low resolution, low details

Metro Last Light (low details, low resolution)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASRock X99 WS 202.81 101.28 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 202.61 101.16 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 202.12 100.93 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 201.98 100.86 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 200.99 100.37 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 200.67 100.21 %
EVGA X99 Classified 200.25 100.00 %
ASUS X99-A 200.12 99.94 %
MSI X99S MPower 200.11 99.93 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 199.98 99.87 %
more is better


High resolution, high details

Metro Last Light (high details, high resolution)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS X99 Deluxe 64.93 100.51 %
ASRock X99 WS 64.91 100.48 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 64.90 100.46 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 64.88 100.43 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 64.86 100.40 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 64.70 100.15 %
MSI X99S MPower 64.60 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified 64.60 100.00 %
ASUS X99-A 64.58 99.97 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 64.57 99.95 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Thief

Low resolution, low details

Thief (low details, low resolution)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 138.4 103.51 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 138.4 103.51 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 138.3 103.44 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 138.3 103.44 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 138.0 103.22 %
MSI X99S MPower 135.7 101.50 %
ASRock X99 WS 135.1 101.08 %
ASUS X99-A 134.7 100.75 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 134.5 100.60 %
EVGA X99 Classified 133.7 100.00 %
more is better


High resolution, high details

Thief (high details, high resolution)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 84.4 102.55 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 84.2 102.31 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 83.2 101.09 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 83.1 100.97 %
ASRock X99 WS 82.6 100.36 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 82.4 100.12 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 82.4 100.12 %
MSI X99S MPower 82.4 100.12 %
ASUS X99-A 82.3 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified 82.3 100.00 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Right Mark Audio Analyzer

Noise Level, dB (A)
Review Rating
 
ASUS X99 Deluxe -94.6
ASRock X99 Extreme6 -87.4
MSI X99S MPower -88.1
ASRock X99 OC Formula -88.0
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force -92.0
EVGA X99 Classified -90.2
ASRock X99 WS -88.9
ASUS X99-A -88.7
Gigabyte X99-UD4 -84.8
ASUS Rampage V Extreme -84.6
less is better


Dynamic Range dB (A)
Review Rating
 
ASUS X99 Deluxe 94.4
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 92.0
EVGA X99 Classified 90.2
ASRock X99 WS 88.8
ASUS X99-A 88.7
MSI X99S MPower 88.1
ASRock X99 OC Formula 88.0
ASRock X99 Extreme6 87.2
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 84.7
Gigabyte X99-UD4 84.5
more is better


Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)
Review Rating
 
ASRock X99 OC Formula 0.0032
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 0.0048
ASUS X99 Deluxe 0.0062
ASRock X99 Extreme6 0.0083
MSI X99S MPower 0.0094
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 0.0110
Gigabyte X99-UD4 0.0112
ASUS X99-A 0.0114
ASRock X99 WS 0.0116
EVGA X99 Classified 0.0120
less is better


Stereo Crosstalk
Review Rating
 
ASUS X99 Deluxe -92.4
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force -90.7
ASRock X99 OC Formula -87.5
ASUS X99-A -87.5
MSI X99S MPower -87.5
ASRock X99 WS -85.8
ASRock X99 Extreme6 -85.5
EVGA X99 Classified -83.9
Gigabyte X99 UD4 -83.7
ASUS Rampage V Extreme -83.1
less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  

[pagebreak]

BCLK Overclocking[frBCLK Overclocking[/fr]

Idle

 
Review Rating
MHz Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 179 105.29 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 178 104.71 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 176 103.53 %
ASRock X99 WS 176 103.53 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 176 103.53 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 175 102.94 %
ASUS X99-A 175 102.94 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 175 102.94 %
MSI X99S MPower 174 102.35 %
EVGA X99 Classified 170 100.00 %
less is better more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Power Consumption

Idle

Idle
Review Rating
Watt Percent
ASRock X99 WS 81.15 127.11 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 81.60 126.41 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 84.50 120.91 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 85.42 120.76 %
ASUS X99-A 88.50 116.55 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 91.40 112.86 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 102.17 100.96 %
EVGA X99 Classified 103.15 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 105.14 98.11 %
MSI X99S MPower 108.55 95.03 %
less is better more is better


Load

Load
Review Rating
Watt Percent
ASUS X99-A 176.20 108.20 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 178.20 106.99 %
ASRock X99 WS 179.75 106.97 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 183.10 104.12 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 186.77 102.08 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 187.90 101.46 %
EVGA X99 Classified 190.65 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 191.40 100.39 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 202.67 94.07 %
MSI X99S MPower 212.00 89.93 %
less is better more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Performance Rating

3D and Gaming Benchmarks
Review Rating
Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 102.38 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 102.28 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 101.85 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 101.67 %
ASRock X99 WS 101.41 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 101.39 %
ASUS X99-A 101.28 %
MSI X99S MPower 100.93 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 100.32 %
EVGA X99 Classified 100.00 %
more is better


2D Benchmarks
Review Rating
Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 103.10 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 103.06 %
ASRock X99 WS 102.99 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 102.98 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 102.52 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 101.99 %
ASUS X99-A 101.87 %
MSI X99S MPower 101.54 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 100.97 %
EVGA X99 Classified 100.00 %
more is better


Performance per Watt
Review Rating
Percent
ASRock X99 WS 86.64 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 88.09 %
ASUS X99-A 90.64 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 91.33 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 91.59 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 93.18 %
EVGA X99 Classified 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 101.27 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 106.93 %
MSI X99S MPower 109.46 %
less is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Price comparison

Model
Geizhals.eu
ASRock X99 Extreme6
ASRock X99 OC Formula
ASRock X99 WS
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
ASUS X99 Deluxe
ASUS X99-A
EVGA X99 Classified
Gigabyte X99 SOC Force
Gigabyte X99-UD4
MSI X99S MPower



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  
[pagebreak]

Conclusion

Allgemein   + -
With the X99 Extreme6 ASRock has a solid motherboard in it's portfolio, which is based on Intels latest X99 chipset. Having a closer look at the features mix reveals, that the manufacturer has been taking quite a few reasonable descisions. ASRock has for example been holding back on installing too many additional chips, which is something you see in the final price of this product. On another note there are no SATA Express ports on this board. These days there are virtually no SATA Express devices available, which can be seen as a justification for not equipping the board with such ports.   - Design
- Layout
- Number of USB3.0 ports
       
Layout   + -

The ASRock X99 Extreme6's layout has been very well thought. Once more practical are the angled SATA connectors as well as the power- and reset-buttons. There is also a debug display which is very useful in case you should have issues with a component in your system or the board itself. Apart from that the placement of the PCI-Express x16 slots is very well chosen. There is a total of three PCI Express slots, and between the first and the second PCI Express x16 slot there is a M.2 x4 slot. Apart from that we find two additional PCI Express x1 slots on this board.

  - Angled SATA connectors - 2 x PCI Express x1
- Power/Reset-Button onboard
- Debug display
- Space around the CPU socket - M.2 x4
- No SATA Express
       
Performance   + -
Let's have closer look at overall 3D performance. Calcualting the average of all 3D benchmarks we ran, we see that this board comes in fourth place out of ten X99 motherboards we've tested so far. Concerning the average of all 2D benchmarks we ran, this board reaches sixth position. Overall this board does pretty well and ranks in the center of our comparison tables. On another note we had a look at power consumption and it turns out that this board is quite a bit more power efficient than other models.   - Power consumption - 3DMark Ice Storrm
       
Overclocking / BIOS   + -
The BIOS of the X99 Extreme6 is identical from what you get with other recent ASRock motherboards these days the only difference is the backgound color. This means the basic structure and also the design has not been changed. Overall the structure is easy to understand and even if you're not a very experienced user you will find the things you'd like to change. On another note ASRock is dedicated and pushing hard did a pretty good job with this on but still, every here and there the performance could be improved.   - Clear arrangement - Sheer amount of options  
       
Recommendation   + -
The ASRock X99 Extreme6 is on of the more affordable X99 motherboards. You can find this particular model listed at geizhals for a price of 240 Euro. Since the launch the price already dropped by 30 Euro and we expect it to remain stable for quite a while now. Overall you get a very reasonable X99 motherboard that is best to be equipped with an Intel Core i7-5820K CPU.   - Workstation
- Enthusiast
 
       
Rating
We give the ASRock X99 Extreme6 very good 4.5 out of 5 stars.





Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  


Author: m.buechel@ocaholic.ch