Radeon R9 270 vs. GTX 750 Ti
Category : Versus
Published by Hiwa Pouri on 05.08.14
Today we are going to compare the two Mid-range nVidia cards: the GTX 750 Ti with Maxwell GPU and the Radeon R9 270 Curaçao PRO GPU. The GTX 750 Ti is basically the first glimpse at NVIDIAs upcoming Maxwell GPUs and it will be quite interesting to see wether a lower end card from NVIDIA can keep up with a higher end card from AMD.



  Article in English   Artikel in Deutsch   Article en français   Articolo in italiano




Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Test Setup

Hardware

Mainboard
  • ASUS Maximus V Gene (BIOS 1802)
CPUs
  • Intel Core i7-3770K @ 4.0 GHz (Turbo On / HT On)
Memory
  • G.Skill Ares Dual Channel 2x8GB @ CL11-13-13-31-1T-Auto DDR3-2400 MHz
Graphic Cards (Driver)
  • AMD Radeon R9 270 CrossFire
  • nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Drivers
  • Windows 7 x64 (up to date)
  • NVIDIA ForceWare 332.17
  • AMD Catalyst 13.11 BetaV1
  • Intel Chipset Driver 9.4.0.1026
Games and OS
  • Windows 7 x64 (Up to date on the ) 01/10/2013
  • All games were up to date on the 01/10/2013
HDD
  • OCZ Technology Octane 512 GB SSD
PSU
  • Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP / 1000 Watts



Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

3DMark - Fire Strike Performance





Total Score Score Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 5'059 117.13 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4'319 100.00 %
     
Graphics Score Score Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 5'483 117.96 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4'648 100.00 %
More is better





3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme





 
Total Score Score Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 2'503 114.81 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2'180 100.00 %
     
Graphics Score Score Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 2'562 116.24 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2'204 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Unigine Heaven 4.0 Extreme Preset





Total Score Score Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 832 118.52  %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 702 100.00 %
     
Frames per second FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 33.0 118.28 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 27.9 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

BattleField 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 4xMSAA, Ultra, SSAO FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 55.0 123.04 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 44.7 100.00 %
More is better






Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

 

Bioshock Infinite - Benchmark





Ultra Preset, 1920x1080, AA, no DDOF FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 51.11 96.63 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 52.89 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Crysis 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Very High FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 14.0 83.83 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 16.7 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Call of Duty Black Ops 2





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, High FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 79.0 129.72 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 60.9 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

DIRT Showdown - Benchmark





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Ultra FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 62.99 142.51 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 44.20 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Far Cry 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Ultra FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 22.0 101.85 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 21.6 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Sleeping Dogs - Benchmark





High Preset, 1920x1080, Extreme, High-Res Textures FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 34.2 134.65 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 25.4 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xAA, Ultra FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 82.8 139.86 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 59.2 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Metro: Last Light - Benchmark





Very High, 1920x1080, SSAA, DX11 FPS Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 21.93 110.98 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 19.76 100.00 %
More is better





Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Grand Theft Auto V






Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Power Consumption





Power Consumption Idle* Watts Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 53 135.90 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 39 100.00 %
*Entire system Less is better


Power Consumption Load (FurMark)* Watts Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 194 149.23 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 130 100.00 %
*Entire system Less is better






Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Performance Index

Ultra Preset, 1920x1080, AA, no DDOF Index
AMD Radeon R9 270 118.12 %
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 100.00 %
More is better


Ultra Preset, 1920x1080, AA, no DDOF Geizhals Toppreise
AMD Radeon R9 270 Toppreise.ch
nVidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Toppreise.ch
 


Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown  
[pagebreak]

Conclusion

Lets take a closer look at the results in the benchmarks we tested. In this case we can see, that the performance difference between the Radeon R9 270 and the GTX750 Ti in 3DMark is about 17 percent and in Unigine heaven it's close to 18 percent. Benchmarking games the difference between the two cards is considerable: in Bioshock Infinite the R9 270 is 3 percent quicker and when running Crysis we see a 20 percent advantage for the AMD card over the GTX 750 Ti. Taking a closer look at DIRT Showdown we see that the R9 270 is 42 percent quicker, in The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim difference is close to 40 percent and in Sleeping Dogs the Radeon R9 270 is 35 percent faster. On average the Radeon R9 270 is a good 18 percent faster than the GTX 750 Ti.

At this point we also want to have a quick look at power consumption. As we've already discussed in our graphics cards reviews the GTX 750 Ti is one of the most energy efficient graphics cards money can buy these days. Equipping our test setup with the GTX 750 Ti made it consume 14 watt less than with the Radeon R9 270 (39 Watts compared to 53 Watts) under idle condition. When there is load on the graphics card we notice, that the test setup equipped with the Radeon R9 270 needed 64 watt more, compared to the same setup being equipped with a GTX 750 Ti. In other words: the R9 270 is 18 percent quicker than the GTX 750 Ti but that comes at the cost of making our test system consume 33 percent more power.

If we start checking prices, we find the cheapest NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti for 110 Euro, whereas the Radeon R9 270 costs 135 Euro and is therefore quite a bit more expensive. Comparing price differences with performance differences we see that with the Radeon R9 270 you pay 23 percent more in order to get 18 percent more performance. Other than that the AMD card supports CrossFire whereas the NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti is not capable of running SLI. Should you be looking for as much performance as possible from a cheap card, then the Radeon R9 270 is definitely a good choice. In the case of the GTX 750 Ti you get the most energy efficient, descrete graphics card available these days, which also offers very good bang for the buck.


Page 1 - Introduction Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - GTA V
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Performance Index, price
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 17 - Conclusion
Page 9 - DIRT Showdown