ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X Matrix vs. Aircooling

Published by Hiwa Pouri on 08.08.14
Page:
« 1 ... 10 11 12 (13) 14 15 16 »

Consumo

Stock Clocks - Idle Watt Indice
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 67 100.00 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 67 100.00 %
  Più alto è meglio


Overclocking - Idle Watt Indice
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1120 / Mem 1500 MHz) 77 114.93 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1170 / Mem 1500 MHz) 78 116.42 %
  Più alto è meglio


Stock Clocks - Load Watt Indice
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 400 100.00 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 406 101.50%
  Più alto è meglio


Overclocking - Load Watt Indice
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1120 / Mem 1500 MHz) 465 116.25 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1170 / Mem 1500 MHz) 485 121.25 %
  Più alto è meglio



Pagina 1 - Introduzione Pagina 9 - Watch Dogs
Pagina 2 - Test Setup Pagina 10 - Sleeping Dogs
Pagina 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Pagina 11 - Gird Autosport
Pagina 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Pagina 12 - Metro: Last Light
Pagina 5 - BattleField 4 Pagina 13 - Consumo
Pagina 6 - Tomb Raider Pagina 14 - Temperature
Pagina 7 - Thief Pagina 15 - Indice
Pagina 8 - Crysis 3 Pagina 16 - Conclusioni



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN - Aircooling vs. Watercooling EK-FC TITAN MSI GTX 980 Gaming - Watercooling EK-FC980 GTX TF5 vs. Aircooling Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X Matrix vs. Aircooling - Schede video > Aircooling vs. Watercooling - Reviews - ocaholic