Intel Core i7 - 965/920 - architecture and performance

Published by Jean-Luc Hadey on 03.11.08
Page:
« 1 ... 11 12 13 (14) 15 16 »


Games

Crysis 800x600, No AA, No AF, Details: Medium,  results in frames per second
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition, 3.2 GHz 70.23
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz 59.92
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz59.44
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz51.49
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz46.11

more is better



F.E.A.R, 800x600, No AA, No AF, Details: Medium, results in frames per second
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition 3.2 GHz 451
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz441
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz398
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz368
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz274

more is better



Call of Juarez 1024x768, No AA, No AF, Details: Medium,  results in frames per second
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition 3.2 GHz81.2
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz78.0
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz62.6
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz61.4
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz57.9

more is better



World in Conflict 800x600, No AA, No AF, Details: Medium,  results in frames per second
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition,3.2 GHz125
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz81
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz76
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz78
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz67

more is better


Also in games Core i7 performs better than Q9650. Therefore in Crisys Core i7 is 18 percent faster, in F.E.A.R it is 13 percent faster, i Call of Juarez it is nearly 30 percent faster and in World in Conflict it is even 64 percent ahead of a Q9650.


Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren.




comments powered by Disqus

Intel Core i7 - 965/920 - architecture and performance - CPUs Reviews - Reviews - ocaholic