Intel Core i7 - 965/920 - architecture and performance

Published by Jean-Luc Hadey on 03.11.08
Page:
« 1 ... 9 10 11 (12) 13 14 15 16 »


Datacompression and rendering

Data compression

WinRAR, 4 x 70MB 48 Bit TIFF pictures to a 297 MB archive file
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition, 3.2 GHz77 sec
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz 89 sec
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz118 sec
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz172 sec
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz185 sec

less is better



7-Zip Kompression 64MB, results in MIPS (million instructions per second)
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition 3.2 GHz 16030
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz 11726
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz10952
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz6342
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz4769

more is better


Datacompression performs on a Nehalem system up to 53 percent better.


Rendering

POV-Ray 3.7, All CPU Benchmark
IntelCore I7-965 Extr. Edition,3.2 GHz 62 sec
Intel Core I7-920,2.66 GHz74 sec
IntelCore2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz103 sec
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz187 sec
Intel Core2 Dual E7200,2.53 GHz247 sec

less is better



POV- Ray 3.7, All CPU Benchmark, results in pixels per second (PPS)
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition 3.2 GHz4'164.52
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz3'532.03
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz2'542.23
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz1'398.71
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz1'057.86

more is better



Cinebench R10 Multi CPU Rendering, Cinebench Score
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition 3.2 GHz 19'046
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz 15'920
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz12'943
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz7'963
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz5'981

more is better


In both POV-Ray benchmarks Core i7 965 is at least 60 percent faster than Q9650 and in Cinebench it still is 47 percent.






comments powered by Disqus

Intel Core i7 - 965/920 - architecture and performance - CPUs Reviews - Reviews - ocaholic