With the OCZ RD400, Toshiba launches an NVMe-SSD for end users. The drive which is lying front of us appears to perform extremely well pumping out up to 2600 MB/s sequentially reading and 1600 MB/s sequentially writing. This definitely makes us wonder how much of that horsepower is available in real life.
Specifications / Delivery
Model |
RD400 128 GB |
RD400 256 GB |
RD400 512 GB |
RD400 1 TB |
Capacity |
128 GB |
256 GB |
512 GB |
1 TB |
Form
Factor |
M.2 2280 single-sided |
M.2 2280 single-sided |
M.2 2280 single-sided |
M.2 2280 double-sided |
Controller |
Toshiba TC58NCP070GSB |
Toshiba TC58NCP070GSB |
Toshiba TC58NCP070GSB |
Toshiba TC58NCP070GSB |
Memory |
|
|
|
|
Throughput |
- 2'200 MB/s sequential read
- 620 MB/s sequential write
- 170'000 IOPS 4K random read
- 110'000 IOPS 4K random write
|
- 2'600 MB/s sequential read
- 1'150 MB/s sequential write
- 210'000 IOPS 4K random read
- 140'000 IOPS 4K random write
|
- 2'600 MB/s sequential read
- 1'600 MB/s sequential write
- 190'000 IOPS 4K random read
- 120
'000 IOPS 4K random write
|
- 2'600 MB/s sequential read
- 1'550 MB/s sequential write
- 210'000 IOPS 4K random read
- 130'000 IOPS 4K random write
|
Power
Consumption |
|
|
|
|
Endurance |
74 TBW |
148 TBW |
296 TBW |
592 TBW |
Warranty |
5 Years |
5 Years |
5 Years |
5 Years |
Price |
|
|
|
|
It’s not been too long that Toshiba acquired OCZ and after two and half years as a subsidiary of the electronics giant OCZ is not a subsidiary of anymore but Toshiba’s enthusiast SSD brand. A quick look at the packaging clearly shows that since now “Toshiba” is printed on the box art as well and it stands in front of “OCZ RD400”. Talking a bit more about the name: if you’ve been following the news you might have picked up that OCZ initially planned to launch die RevoDrive 400 (now RD400) almost a year ago. But apparently that didn’t happen and it looks like Toshiba decided it would be a good idea to kick off the OCZ sub brand having a powerful flagship product in their portfolio.
Diving a bit deeper into the technical aspects of this drive, we find almost no information at all about the controller Toshiba is using on this drive (TC58NCP070GSB). So far it’s being assumed that on the Trion/TR drives, Toshiba decided to rebrand a Phison S10 controller and therefore it could be possible that the OCZ RD400 is also based on a third party controller. In such a case it would be most likely that a Marvell 88SS1093 has been used, which features three cores and eight channels. With the OCZ RD400 Toshiba is the second vendor having a M.2 NVMe SSD in its portfolio. So far only Samsung offered such a product with their 950 Pro and it’s good to see there is finally some much needed competition in this niche. Comparing the offerings from the two vendors only Toshiba offers a 1 Terabyte model for now. Apart from that the OCZ RD400 should be blisteringly fast according to the specifications. What’s also interesting to know about the OCZ RD400 is the fact, that it’s basically the same drive you can find in Microsoft’s Surface Pro 4. In there you find an OEM version, which goes by the name Toshiba XG3 M.2. The only differences between the two drives concern software and warranty. The OCZ RD400 supports “SSD Management Utility” (formerly OCZ SSD Guru) and it also benefits from five year “Advanced Warranty” (formerly Shield Plus). Furthermore there is the option to buy the OCZ RD400 in combination with a PCI Express adapter card. Regarding the SSD Management Utility only cosmetic changes to the user interface have been done, otherwise it’s the same software like OCZ SSD Guru was.
A quick look at the NAND flash memory used on these drives, we see Toshiba is using 15nm chips. Regarding the single-sided models up to 512 GB capacity is possible, whereas the double-sided M.2 drive features 1 Terabyte. Meanwhile the endurance of solid state drives isn’t anything that could be concerning, since recent controllers are capable of carefully allocating resources and therefore the vendors became increasingly confident regarding their TBW (Terabytes Written) figures they communicate – as you can see in the table above.
[pagebreak]
Impressions
[pagebreak]
How do we test?
Testenvironment
iozone
iozone3 is a benchmark suite for storage solutions which natively runs under
Windows/Linux.
We are testing
the throughput rates/IOPS with different block sizes using the following commands:
KByte/s
- iozone -Rb test4k.xls -i0 -i1 -i2 -+n -r 4k -s4g -t32
- iozone -Rb test256k.xls -i0 -i1 -i2 -+n -r 256k -s4g -t32
iops
- iozone -Rb test4ko.xls -i0 -i1 -i2 -+n -r 4k -s4g -t32 -O
[pagebreak]
KByte/s, Sequential write
[pagebreak]
KByte/s, Sequential Read
[pagebreak]
KByte/s, Random write
[pagebreak]
KByte/s, Random read
[pagebreak]
IOPS, Random write
[pagebreak]
IOPS, Random read
[pagebreak]
Throughput 1 Thread (QD1)
1T Throughput (KB/s) |
|
4k |
8k |
16k |
32k |
64k |
128k |
256k |
512k |
Seq write |
781886 |
936395 |
951713 |
971613 |
980526 |
973551 |
950815 |
1005883 |
Seq read |
742954 |
784409 |
887869 |
872398 |
951857 |
1091949 |
1197804 |
1324266 |
Rand write |
121407 |
235429 |
423098 |
614342 |
908722 |
1098376 |
1217195 |
941617 |
Rand read |
31270 |
55122 |
91957 |
182941 |
285952 |
485042 |
657801 |
807298 |
Throughput 4 Threads (QD4)
4T Throughput (KB/s) |
|
4k |
8k |
16k |
32k |
64k |
128k |
256k |
512k |
Seq write |
1001920 |
1045429 |
984243 |
1074665 |
1082517 |
1151396 |
1089711 |
1017300 |
Seq read |
1638823 |
1688342 |
1821263 |
1850700 |
1942146 |
2277597 |
2361586 |
2362913 |
Rand write |
552605 |
971546 |
1357378 |
1578196 |
1367254 |
1497647 |
1566174 |
1544035 |
Rand read |
136475 |
229817 |
398468 |
675988 |
1048405 |
1437803 |
1558700 |
1787351 |
Throughput 8 Threads (QD8)
8T Throughput (KB/s) |
|
4k |
8k |
16k |
32k |
64k |
128k |
256k |
512k |
Seq write |
1036157 |
1119157 |
1106172 |
1097818 |
1107502 |
1239248 |
1037971 |
1092075 |
Seq read |
1641371 |
1741336 |
1786147 |
1882773 |
1952239 |
2189610 |
2282887 |
2392491 |
Rand write |
535273 |
867566 |
1341508 |
1514495 |
1522389 |
1534229 |
1546402 |
1588615 |
Rand read |
283644 |
442584 |
721838 |
1122838 |
1525427 |
1744992 |
1929136 |
2068674 |
Throughput 16 Threads (QD16)
16T Throughput (KB/s) |
|
4k |
8k |
16k |
32k |
64k |
128k |
256k |
512k |
Seq write |
1063490 |
1000404 |
1229520 |
982059 |
1122832 |
1024245 |
1048963 |
1124947 |
Seq read |
1434365 |
1613706 |
1810949 |
1598583 |
1613156 |
1838101 |
2266190 |
2330318 |
Rand write |
502212 |
910787 |
1320142 |
1537874 |
1482744 |
1380710 |
1399370 |
2133827 |
Rand read |
537128 |
799518 |
1181787 |
1514542 |
1457180 |
1499325 |
1954025 |
1462117 |
Throughput 32 Threads (QD32)
32T Throughput (KB/s) |
|
4k |
8k |
16k |
32k |
64k |
128k |
256k |
512k |
Seq write |
1069391 |
1035737 |
1054881 |
1043280 |
1065558 |
966798 |
1082283 |
1126801 |
Seq read |
1189768 |
1291979 |
1347052 |
1382287 |
1450701 |
1994413 |
2620958 |
2614949 |
Rand write |
508788 |
898060 |
455551 |
1473488 |
1567470 |
1354494 |
1557057 |
1605223 |
Rand read |
888580 |
1076539 |
1250685 |
1236076 |
1332771 |
1571091 |
1580537 |
1627586 |
[pagebreak]
Conclusion
Announcement: Despite the circumstance that the rating of a product is based on as many
objective facts as possible there are factors which can have an influence on a
rating after publication. Every autor may perceive data differently over time
whereas one possible reason for example is a deeper background knowledge or
understanding of certain processes. Certain unforseen market conditions as well
as changes have the potential to render a descision made at a certain point in
time obsolete.
With their OCZ RD400 M.2 series Toshiba created a new SSD, which addresses enthusiasts and professionals. In our opinion Toshiba succeeded in releasing a new high-performance, enthusiast-grade SSD positioning OCZ as a sub brand and not an individual company anymore. All new NVMe drives these days simply raise the bar in terms of performance to another level and bring the entire enthusiast market a big step forward. Throughput rates in the region of 2'600 MB/s are about four times as much then what’s achievable with SATA-III, which puts these NVMe drives in a entirely different league.
In terms of raw performance our test drive was able to score 1586 MB/s sequential
write and 2'620 MB/s sequential read throughput. When it comes to 4K
IOPS we measured 127'200 IOPS regarding random read and 222'100 regarding random
write. The performance of this drive is simply insane, outperforming the SATA-III standard by a factor of four regarding sequential read.
On another note we also
had a look at performance varying queue depth as you can see on page 10.
In the case of random read performance at QD1 we see 7'800 IOPS and when it comes to random write we measured 30'400 IOPS.
What's always worth mentioning with OCZ drive is their warranty plan. Meanwhile, as a sub brand of Toshiba the it's called Advanced
Warranty and not Shield Plus anymore. The service remains the same. In the event of a drive failure Toshiba will pay for the shipment back and replace the drive without hesitation and the warranty plan lasts for five years.
Today the OCZ RD400 M.2 is available with 128 Gigabyte, 256 Gigabyte, 512 Gigabyte and 1 Terabyte capacity and the MSRP is without PCI Express adapter card are 109.99 US-Dollar, 169.99 US-Dollar, 309.99 US-Dollar and 739.99 US-Dollar respectively. If you'd like to buy the version including the adpater card, you'll have to pay an addiotal 20 US-Dollar. Those drives are definitely not cheap, but considering what you get the price is adequate. The performance is just mindblowing and the NVMe standard helps pushing the boudries of how fast SSDs can be. Should you be an enthusiast or a professional looking for a fast M.2 drive, then we can recommend these drive without a shadow of a doubt.