ASUS GTX580 DirectCU II

Published by Marc Büchel on 05.02.11
Page:
« 1 ... 3 4 5 (6) 7 8 9 10 »

3DMark 11

3DMark 11 is Futuremarks latest benchmark for the entire graphical subsystem. The benchmark uses DirectX 11 and it supports all recent features which can possibly generate high load on a GPU. Therefore you find tessellation, compute shader calculations, divers lighting effects and different depth of filed animations. Following we publish values regarding the performance preset of 3DMark 11.




3DMark 11 Total Score Percent
AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire 8'772 245.23 %
ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII 5'988 167.40 %
Palit GTX 580 SLI 5'841 163.29 %
ASUS GTX 580 5'803 162.23 %
ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII 5'335 149.15 %
ASUS EAH6970 2GB 5'175 144.67 %
Zotac GTX480 SLI 5'046 141.07 %
Zotac GTX 480 4'922 137.60 %
ASUS EAH6950 2GB 4'606 128.77 %
Gigabyte GTX460 3'754  104.95 %
ASUS EAH6850 3'577 100.00 %
  more is better


3DMark 11 GPU Score Percent
AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire 10'189 305.52 %
ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII 5'872 176.07 %
ASUS GTX 580 5'812 174.27 %
Palit ENGTX 580 SLI 5'697  170.82 %
ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII 5'132 153.88 %
ASUS EAH6970 2GB 4'949 148.40 %
Zotac GTX480 SLI 4'870 146.03 %
Zotac GTX 480 4'802 143.99 %
ASUS EAH6950 2GB 4'108 123.18 %
Gigabyte GTX460 3'562  106.81 %
ASUS EAH6850 3'335 100.00 %
  more is better


3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems struggle.

3DMark Vantage Score Percent
Palit GTX 580 SLI 36'482 262.50 %
AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire 25'076 180.43 %
nVidia GTX 295 SLI 24'638 177.28 %
Zotac GTX480 SLI 24'520 176.43 %
ASUS ARES 5870X2 2DIS 4GD5 22'496 161.86 %
ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII 21'341 153.55 %
ASUS ENGTX 580 21'171 152.42 %
ZOTAC GTX 285 SLI 19'441 139.88 %
ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII 19'165 137.90 %
ZOTAC GTX 275 1792MB SLI 19'098 137.41 %
ASUS EAH6970 2GB 19'019 136.85 %
ASUS EAH5970 18'895 135.95 %
Gigabyte HD5870 Super Overclock 18'244 131.27 %
Zotac GTX 480 17'859 128.50 %
MSI HD 5870 Lightning 17'732 127.58 %
nVidia GTX 295 17'598 126.62 %
ASUS EAH6950 2GB 17'485 125.81 %
ASUS GTX 470 16'730 120.37 %
ASUS EAH5870 16'056 115.52 %
ASUS EAH6850 DirectCU 15'301 110.09 %
ASUS EAH5850 13'898 100.00 %
ASUS GTX285 Matrix 13'047 93.87 %
MSI GTX 275 Lightning 12'323 88.09 %
ASUS EAH3870X2 9'508 68.41 %
ASUS ENGTS250 DK 8'481 61.02 %
EVGA 8800 GT 512MB 6'427 46.24 %
  more is better


3DMark Vantage GPU Score Percent
Palit GTX 580 SLI 33'378 254.08 %
AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire 29'775 226.65 %
Zotac GTX480 SLI 29'283 222.90 %
nVidia GTX 295 SLI 29'128 221.72 %
ASUS ARES 5870X2 2DIS 4GD5 25'544 194.44 %
ASUS ENGTX 580 23'628  179.85 %
ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII 23'440 178.43 %
ZOTAC GTX 285 SLI 20'715 157.68 %
ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII 20'039 152.54 %
ZOTAC GTX 275 1792MB SLI 19'960 151.93 %
ASUS EAH6970 2GB 19'835 150.99 %
ASUS EAH5970 19'789 150.63 %
Gigabyte HD5870 Super Overclock 18'745 142.68 %
Zotac GTX 480 18'345 139.64 %
MSI HD 5870 Lightning 18'095 137.74 %
nVidia GTX 295 17'857 135.93 %
ASUS EAH6950 2GB 17'679 134.57 %
ASUS EAH5870 15'858 120.71 %
ASUS EAH6850 DirectCU 14'866 113.16 %
ASUS GTX 470 13'753 104.68 %
ASUS EAH5850 13'137 100.00 %
ASUS GTX285 Matrix 12'156 92.53 %
MSI GTX 275 Lightning 11'337 86.29 %
ASUS EAH3870X2 8'292 63.12 %
ASUS ENGTS250 DK 6'722 51.17 %
EVGA 8800 GT 512MB 5'328 40.55 %
  more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 6 - Futuremark
Page 2 - Specifications Page 7 - Unigine Heaven / Stone Giant
Page 3 - Preview Page 8 - World in Conflict / Resident Evil 5
Page 4 - Overclocking Page 9 - Call of Juarez / Far Cry 2
Page 5 - Testing conditions Page 10 - Conclusion



To the comments




Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS ENGTX580 Gigabyte GTX460 Super Overclock Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS GTX580 DirectCU II - Graphics cards > Reviews > NVIDIA - Reviews - ocaholic