Review: ASRock Z77 OC Formula

Published by Marc Büchel on 04.12.12
Page:
« 1 ... 14 15 16 (17) 18 19 20 »

Games

Crysis 800 x 600, low details

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
Biostar Hi-Fi Z77X
No Review
179.41 107.87 %
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
No Review
179.14 107.71 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Pro Thunderbolt
No Review
174.57 104.71 %
ASUS Maximus V Extreme
No Review
174.05 104.65 %
ASUS P8H77-I
No Review
173.23 104.15 %
ASUS P8Z77 WS
No Review
168.11 101.08 %
Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
No Review
167.32 100.60 %
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
No Review
167.05 100.44 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
No Review
166.50 100.10 %
ASRock Z77 OC Formula
No Review
166.44 100.07 %
Intel DZ77GA-70K
No Review
166.32 100.00 %
ASUS Maximus V Gene
No Review
165.97 99.79 %
Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
No Review
165.66 99.60 %
ASUS P8Z77-V
No Review
165.00 99.21 %
MSI Z77 MPower
No Review
163.93 98.56 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
No Review
163.91 98.55 %
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
No Review
162.97 97.99 %
Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
No Review
162.32 97.59 %
ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
No Review
162.20 97.52 %
ASUS Maximus V Formula
No Review
160.84 96.71 %
ASRock Z77 Extreme6
No Review
160.72 96.63 %
  more is better


Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 benchmark we can again show CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
Intel DZ77GA-70K
No Review
221.4 100.00 %
Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
No Review
219.5 99.14 %
MSI Z77 MPower
No Review
218.8 98.83 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
No Review
218.7 98.78 %
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
No Review
218.5 98.69 %
ASUS P8Z77-V
No Review
217.7 98.33 %
ASRock Z77 Extreme6
No Review
215.7 97.43 %
Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
No Review
215.7 97.43 %
Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
No Review
215.7 97.43 %
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
No Review
213.2 96.30 %
ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
No Review
212.6 96.03 %
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
No Review
211.9 95.71 %
ASUS Maximus V Gene
No Review
211.6 95.57 %
Biostar Hi-Fi Z77X
No Review
208.0 93.95 %
ASUS P8Z77 WS
No Review
207.7 93.81 %
ASUS Maximus V Extreme
No Review
207.3 93.63 %
ASUS P8H77-I
No Review
207.2 93.59 %
ASRock Z77 OC Formula
No Review
206.3 93.18 %
ASUS Maximus V Formula
No Review
205.3 92.73 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Pro Thunderbolt
No Review
203.6 91.96 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
No Review
201.5 91.01 %
  more is better


Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
No Review
832.85 106.43 %
ASUS Maximus V Extreme
No Review
810.15 103.53 %
ASUS P8Z77 WS
No Review
808.12 103.27 %
Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
No Review
806.81 103.11 %
MSI Z77 MPower
No Review
805.95 103.00 %
Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
No Review
803.92 102.74 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
No Review
802.43 102.55 %
ASUS P8Z77-V
No Review
802.37 102.54 %
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
No Review
801.05 102.37 %
ASUS Maximus V Gene
No Review
797.67 101.94 %
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
No Review
795.52 101.66 %
Biostar Hi-Fi Z77X
No Review
794.82 101.57 %
ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
No Review
789.76 100.93 %
Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
No Review
783.26 100.10 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Pro Thunderbolt
No Review
782.74 100.03 %
Intel DZ77GA-70K
No Review
782.50 100.00 %
ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
No Review
780.81 99.78 %
ASRock Z77 Extreme6
No Review
780.76 99.78 %
ASUS Maximus V Formula
No Review
771.96 98.65 %
ASUS P8H77-I
No Review
766.45 97.95 %
ASRock Z77 OC Formula
No Review
762.70 97.47 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 11 - PC Mark 7
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 3 - Features Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 4 - Layout Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 6 - BIOS Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 7 - Test setup Page 17 - Games
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 20 - Conclusion



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Preview: Gigabyte Z77X-UP7 ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt Preview Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Review: ASRock Z77 OC Formula - Motherboards > Intel > Z77 - Reviews - ocaholic