ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review

Reviews > Motherboards > ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review

Published by rewarder on 05.02.13 (14618 reads)

Page:

« 1 ... 7 8 9 (10) 11 12 13 14 »

SiSoft Sandra 2

At this point we deliver the values regarding Memory Bandwidth, Memory Latency as well as Memory and Cache Access.

Memory bandwidth

Integer	GByte/s	Percent
ASUS Crosshair V Formula	14.30	145.33 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0	14.30	145.33 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo	14.29	145.22 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z	14.27	145.02 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme	14.24	144.71 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX	13.10	133.13 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P	13.00	132.11 %
ECS A890GXM-A2	13.00	132.11 %
ASUS M4A78T-E	13.00	132.11 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M	13.00	132.11 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5	12.70	129.06 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4)	9.84	100.00 %
	Higher is better

floating point	GByte/s	Percent
ASUS Crosshair V Formula	14.30	145.33 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo	14.30	145.33 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0	14.30	145.33 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z	14.26	144.92 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme	14.24	144.71 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX	13.00	132.11 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P	13.00	132.11 %
ECS A890GXM-A2	13.00	132.11 %
ASUS M4A78T-E	13.00	132.11 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M	13.00	132.11 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5	12.75	129.57 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4)	9.84	100.00 %
	Higher is better

Memory latency

Memory latency	ns	Percent
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme	70.40	92.39 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0	71.00	93.17 %
ASUS M4A78T-E	72.50	95.14 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z	75.40	98.95 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M	75.60	99.21 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P	75.50	99.08 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4)	76.20	100.00 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo	76.30	100.13 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula	78.20	102.62 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX	80.20	105.25 %
ECS A890GXM-A2	81.00	106.30 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5	85.90	112.73 %
	Lower is better

Memory and cache access

Memory and cache access	GByte/s	Percent
ASUS M5A99X Evo	85.84	105.84 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z	85.19	105.04 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula	85.00	104.81 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme	84.48	104.17 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0	84.40	104.07 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5	83.87	103.41 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX	83.00	102.34 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P	81.70	100.74 %
ASUS M4A78T-E	81.30	100.24 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4)	81.10	100.00 %
ECS A890GXM-A2	81.14	100.05 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M	80.70	99.50 %
	Higher is better

Page 1 - Introduction	Page 8 - Futuremark
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery	Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 3 - Features	Page 10 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 4 - Layout	Page 11 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O	Page 12 - Games
Page 6 - BIOS	Page 13 - Overclocking
Page 7 - Test setup	Page 14 - Conclusion

Discuss this article in the forums

Page:

« 1 ... 7 8 9 (10) 11 12 13 14 »

5 Comment(s) Items by the same author

Navigate through the articles
ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt Preview	ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 Preview

Rating 3.80/5

Rating: 3.8/5 (5 votes)

The comments are owned by the author. We aren't responsible for their content.

Author	Thread
Anonymous	Published: 2013/2/7 17:03 Updated: 2013/2/7 19:00
	Re: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review being a desktop form factor is a negative? your reviewing a desktop motherboard.

rewarder	Published: 2013/2/7 19:01 Updated: 2013/2/7 19:01
Webmaster Joined: 2004/7/5 From: Zürich CH Comments: 1189	Re: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review Could you please explain to which section you're referring?

Christian Ney	Published: 2013/2/8 9:07 Updated: 2013/2/8 9:07
Webmaster Joined: 2010/12/1 From: France Comments: 937	Re: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review Maybe "- Desktop PC" is confusing, change it to "- Office PC".

rewarder	Published: 2013/2/8 11:17 Updated: 2013/2/8 11:17
Webmaster Joined: 2004/7/5 From: Zürich CH Comments: 1189	Re: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review Ok, I also thought it was the part in the conclusion.

Anonymous	Published: 2013/4/21 4:49 Updated: 2013/4/22 13:54
	Need a real review I understand this is a basic review but this motherboard is geared to gamers so all of the other benchmarks you have mean nothing. Second, this board was designed for the FX chips, I know a phenom works but it would be nice to see a Vishera chip in the tests. Also who games at 600 x 800? Try using a graphics card that is up to date. My HD 7770 mid to low end GPU is faster. And last, You missed a lot of features on this board like the ROG connect and others that are geared toward gamers. If you are not a hardcore gamer you should not be looking at this board. If you like AMD and are a serious gamer this is the cats meow.

Publish Comment

Comment Rules*	Comments by registered users are always approved
Title*
Name*
Email*
Website*
Message*
Confirmation Code*	5 + 9 = ? Input the result from the expression Maximum attempts you can try: 5

Advanced Search

Select Language

Advertisment