Reviews > Motherboards > ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review

ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 05.02.13 (31354 reads)
Page:
« 1 ... 6 7 8 (9) 10 11 12 ... 14 »

SiSoft Sandra 1

SiSoft Sandra is a theoretical multi purpose benchmark suite which is able to show differences in CPU architectures. We split the tests with SiSoft Sandra into two parts. Therefore on this page you'll find Arithmetic-, Multimedia- and Cryptography-benchmarks.

Arithmetic Benchmark

Dhrystone GIPS Percent
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 76.17 100.00 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 75.15 98.56 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 75.00 98.46 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 74.56 97.88 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 74.49 97.79 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 74.08 97.25 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 72.47 95.14 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 70.58 92.66 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 68.99 90.57 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 65.33 85.77 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 65.30 85.73 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 63.00 82.71 %
  Higher is better


Whetstone GFLOPS Percent
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 56.63 101.51 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 56.59 101.43 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 56.00 100.38 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 56.00 100.38 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 55.86 100.12 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 55.79 100.00 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 55.76 99.94 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 55.74 99.91 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 55.62 99.70 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 55.56 99.59 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 55.50 99.48 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 55.35 99.57 %
  Higher is better


Multimedia

Integer MPixels/sec Percent
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 83.39 100.23 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 83.36 100.19 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 83.33 100.15 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 83.30 100.12 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 83.20 100.00 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 83.20 100.00 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 83.19 99.99 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 83.14 99.93 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 83.10 99.88 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 83.00 99.76 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 83.00 99.76 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 82.86 99.59 %
  Higher is better


floating point MPixels/sec Percent
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 137.24 101.24 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 137.19 101.20 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 136.19 100.46 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 136.16 100.44 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 136.00 100.32 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 135.86 100.22 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 135.80 100.18 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 135.70 100.10 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 135.56 100.00 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 135.38 99.87 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 135.35 99.84 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 135.34 99.84 %
  Higher is better


Crytography

AES 256 MByte/s Percent
ASUS M5A99X Evo 980 101.03 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 979 100.93 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 978 100.82 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 977 100.72 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 977 100.72 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 976 100.62 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 976 100.62 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 974 100.41 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 974 100.41 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 971 100.10 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 971 100.10 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 970 100.00 %
  Higher is better


SHA 256 MByte/s Percent
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 899 103.21 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 890 102.18 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 883 101.38 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 882 101.26 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 882 101.26 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 881 101.15 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 880 101.03 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 879 100.92 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 878 100.80 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 878 100.80 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 878 100.80 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 871 100.00 %
  Higher is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - Futuremark
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 3 - Features Page 10 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 4 - Layout Page 11 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 12 - Games
Page 6 - BIOS Page 13 - Overclocking
Page 7 - Test setup Page 14 - Conclusion



Discuss this article in the forums







Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt Preview ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 Preview Next article
Rating 3.04/5
Rating: 3.0/5 (54 votes)
comments powered by Disqus

The comments are owned by the author. We aren't responsible for their content.
Author Thread
Anonymous
Published: 2013/2/7 17:03  Updated: 2013/2/7 19:00
 Re: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review
being a desktop form factor is a negative? your reviewing a desktop motherboard.
rewarder
Published: 2013/2/7 19:01  Updated: 2013/2/7 19:01
Webmaster
Joined: 07/05/2004
From: Zürich CH
Comments: 3174
 Re: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review
Could you please explain to which section you're referring?
Christian Ney
Published: 2013/2/8 9:07  Updated: 2013/2/8 9:07
Webmaster
Joined: 12/01/2010
From: Switzerland
Comments: 1722
 Re: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review
Maybe "- Desktop PC" is confusing, change it to "- Office PC".
rewarder
Published: 2013/2/8 11:17  Updated: 2013/2/8 11:17
Webmaster
Joined: 07/05/2004
From: Zürich CH
Comments: 3174
 Re: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z Review
Ok, I also thought it was the part in the conclusion.
Anonymous
Published: 2013/4/21 4:49  Updated: 2013/4/22 13:54
 Need a real review
I understand this is a basic review but this motherboard is geared to gamers so all of the other benchmarks you have mean nothing. Second, this board was designed for the FX chips, I know a phenom works but it would be nice to see a Vishera chip in the tests. Also who games at 600 x 800? Try using a graphics card that is up to date. My HD 7770 mid to low end GPU is faster. And last, You missed a lot of features on this board like the ROG connect and others that are geared toward gamers. If you are not a hardcore gamer you should not be looking at this board. If you like AMD and are a serious gamer this is the cats meow.
Select Language
Advertisment

Comments
Advertisment

Advertisment
Who is Online
69 user(s) are online (39 user(s) are browsing Reviews)

Members: 0
Guests: 69

more...