Reviews > Motherboards > Review: ASUS Maximus V Extreme

Review: ASUS Maximus V Extreme

Published by rewarder on 05.07.12 (57462 reads)
Page:
« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 7 ... 21 »

Layout

At a first glance the ASUS Maximus V Extreme looks very good with its harmonic design. Once again the ROG-colors - red, black and white - suite nicely and together with the black PCB it becomes a beautiful product. The layout itself is well thought and there is for example plenty of space around the CPU socket to install even todays largest CPU coolers. The fact that there are SATA connector which have been angled by 90 degrees allow an easy installation of oversized graphics cards.


The ASUS Maximus V Extreme comes with a digital 8+4+2 phase power design. The CPU gets eight phases, the iGPU can rely on four phases and the memory gets a stable current supply from two individual pahses. Furthermore ASUS equips this board with their so called "Black Metallic Chokes". These can resist temperatures ranging from -70°C to +125°C. This makes the power desing even better for extreme overclocking where extremely low temperatures around the CPU socket can be reached.


Totally you'll find four DIMM-slots on the Maximus V Extreme. Officially supported are DDR3 2800 (OC), 2666 (OC), 2600(OC), 2400 (OC), 2200 (OC), 2133 (OC), 2000 (OC), 1866 (OC), 1600, 1333 and 1066 MHz. There is engough space between the DIMM-slots and the CPU socket which means that you wont encounter compatibility problems with big coolers even when you choose to install RAM with big heatspreaders. Also supported are Xtreme Memory Profiles (XMP) in version 1.3.


On the Maximus V Extreme the southbridge as well as the PLX chip, which can be found between CPU socket and the first PCI-Express x16 slot, are being cooled by passiv cooling blocks, which have been connected via a heatpipe. For the current converters we see a very similar picture. There are also two passive cooling elements connected via a heatpipe. In fact, the PLX chip is always an interesting feature. In this case ASUS chose to put a PLX PEX8747 PCI Express 3.0 bridge chip onto the board. This chip is able to multiply the 16 lanes, which come from the CPU, by two an therefore provied 32 lanes. As long as you don't use more than two graphics card 16 lanes are sufficient but once you run a setup with three or four graphics cards you will need at least 24 or 32 lanes.

  


Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Features Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 4 - Layout Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 6 - BIOS Page 17 - Games
Page 7 - Test setup Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 20 - Conclusion
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 21 - Personal opinion
Page 11 - PC Mark 7  



Discuss this article in the forums

Page:
« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 7 ... 21 »

Navigate through the articles
Previous article Preview: ASUS Maximus V Extreme ASUS P8Z77-V Premium Preview Next article
Rating 3.43/5
Rating: 3.4/5 (7 votes)
 
The comments are owned by the author. We aren't responsible for their content.
Author Thread
Anonymous
Published: 2012/7/6 19:10  Updated: 2012/7/6 19:10
 Games?
Benchmarking games in 800X600 and in lowdetails??????
You're abnormal!
Reply
Anonymous
Published: 2012/7/14 18:08  Updated: 2012/7/14 18:08
 Re: Games?
I do not believe in benchmarking with motherboards, since the difference between the results are often within the margin of error, simply due to the motherboard not afftecting the perfomance that much in games and benchmarks. I believe the reviewer used lower resolutions since that wiuld make the fps difference larger compared to running it at 1080p with the highest settings.
Reply
rewarder
Published: 2012/7/14 20:53  Updated: 2012/7/14 20:53
Webmaster
Joined: 2004/7/5
From: Zürich CH
Comments: 962
 Re: Games?
Quote:
I do not believe in benchmarking with motherboards, since the difference between the results are often within the margin of error, simply due to the motherboard not afftecting the perfomance that much in games and benchmarks. I believe the reviewer used lower resolutions since that wiuld make the fps difference larger compared to running it at 1080p with the highest settings.


Yes, you got it right. At 1080p you see that almost only the GPU has an influence on performance. To show the performance influence of the mobo you have to reduce the graphics load as much as possible.
Furthermore you're also right with your point that in some cases you're measuring standard deviation. Never the less it is interesting to see that for example in Super Pi one can see changes with every BIOS update.
Reply
Publish Comment
Comment Rules*
Comments by registered users are always approved
Title*
Name*
Email*
Website*
Message*
Confirmation Code*
0 + 6 = ?  
Input the result from the expression
Maximum attempts you can try: 5
Select Language
Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment
Who is Online
31 user(s) are online (11 user(s) are browsing Reviews)

Members: 0
Guests: 31

more...