ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X Matrix vs. Aircooling

Published by Hiwa Pouri on 08.08.14
Page:
« 1 ... 10 11 12 (13) 14 15 16 »

Power Consumption

Stock Clocks - Idle Watt Index
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 67 100.00 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 67 100.00 %
  More is better


Overclocking - Idle Watt Index
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1120 / Mem 1500 MHz) 77 114.93 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1170 / Mem 1500 MHz) 78 116.42 %
  More is better


Stock Clocks - Load Watt Index
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 400 100.00 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1050 / Mem 1350MHz) 406 101.50%
  More is better


Overclocking - Load Watt Index
Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1120 / Mem 1500 MHz) 465 116.25 %
Watercooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum (GPU 1170 / Mem 1500 MHz) 485 121.25 %
  More is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Watch Dogs
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 10 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 11 - Gird Autosport
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 12 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 4 Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 6 - Tomb Raider Page 14 - Temperatures
Page 7 - Thief Page 15 - Index
Page 8 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Conclusion



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN - Aircooling vs. Watercooling EK-FC TITAN MSI GTX 980 Gaming - Watercooling EK-FC980 GTX TF5 vs. Aircooling Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X Matrix vs. Aircooling - Graphics cards > Aircooling vs. Watercooling - Reviews - ocaholic